[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Another slot operator bug (bug 486580, try 2)

2013-11-28 Thread SebastianLuther
From: Sebastian Luther sebastianlut...@gmx.de This time rebuilds are scheduled properly, but we might still forget to install the package that caused the rebuild. URL: https://bugs.gentoo.org/486580 --- pym/_emerge/depgraph.py| 30 ++-

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Another slot operator bug (bug 486580, try 2)

2013-11-28 Thread SebastianLuther
From: Sebastian Luther sebastianlut...@gmx.de This time rebuilds are scheduled properly, but we might still forget to install the package that caused the rebuild. URL: https://bugs.gentoo.org/486580 --- pym/_emerge/depgraph.py| 48 +++--

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Another slot operator bug (bug 486580, try 2)

2013-11-28 Thread Sebastian Luther
Please ignore this one. I reorganized these large duplicated if's as suggested by dol-sen on IRC in a new version of this patch.

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Another slot operator bug (bug 486580, try 2)

2013-11-28 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Thu, 2013-11-28 at 20:36 +0100, Sebastian Luther wrote: Am 28.11.2013 15:47, schrieb Brian Dolbec: I like this one much better, thank you. Could you rebase the 2 patches together, this one shows removing lines from the first. Also see inline comments below :) The removed lines are