[gentoo-portage-dev] Fixing EAPI 8 --enable-static once and for all

2022-11-18 Thread David Seifert
Attached a patch to finally fix https://bugs.gentoo.org/814380. When I opened the bug, it was clear that I intended to only disable static libtool archive building. Unfortunately, I hadn't done the necessary due diligence, and it turns out how we detect the "--enable-static" flag is overly broad a

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Fixing EAPI 8 --enable-static once and for all

2022-11-19 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Sat, 19 Nov 2022, David Seifert wrote: > With this extensive analysis, I believe this patch to be safe. Still looks like an incompatible change, so it will need an EAPI bump. EAPI 9 feature bug is here: https://bugs.gentoo.org/815169 signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Fixing EAPI 8 --enable-static once and for all

2022-11-19 Thread Michał Górny
On Sat, 2022-11-19 at 09:33 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, 19 Nov 2022, David Seifert wrote: > > > With this extensive analysis, I believe this patch to be safe. > > Still looks like an incompatible change, so it will need an EAPI bump. > > EAPI 9 feature bug is here: https://b

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Fixing EAPI 8 --enable-static once and for all

2022-11-19 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 3:33 AM Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > > On Sat, 19 Nov 2022, David Seifert wrote: > > > With this extensive analysis, I believe this patch to be safe. > > Still looks like an incompatible change, so it will need an EAPI bump. > > EAPI 9 feature bug is here: https://bugs.gen