Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Implement new userpatch feature in existing eclass?

2021-04-08 Thread Nekun
On 2021-04-04 20:49, Zac Medico wrote: Today, I count only 2445, or 8.3% of ebuilds have EAPI 5. I imagine that the migration is moving along, since we deprecated EAPI 5 on 2020-11-26 here: https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=b2e281bb698eb93704e1987dc4df1cf2dd3c2cff

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Implement new userpatch feature in existing eclass?

2021-04-04 Thread Zac Medico
On 4/4/21 10:54 AM, Nekun wrote: > Hi all. > > Recently, I start working on optional atom specifiers feature in > userpatch facility: if package directory name starts with percent sign, > following word threated as a regular Portage atom, e.g >

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Implement new userpatch feature in existing eclass?

2021-04-04 Thread Zac Medico
On 4/4/21 10:54 AM, Nekun wrote: > Hi all. > > Recently, I start working on optional atom specifiers feature in > userpatch facility: if package directory name starts with percent sign, > following word threated as a regular Portage atom, e.g >

[gentoo-portage-dev] Implement new userpatch feature in existing eclass?

2021-04-04 Thread Nekun
Hi all. Recently, I start working on optional atom specifiers feature in userpatch facility: if package directory name starts with percent sign, following word threated as a regular Portage atom, e.g "/etc/portage/patches/sys-kernel/%<=gentoo-sources-5.4" ==