Alec Warner posted
b41005390906070208t5d6b552aid928af4ef76f6...@mail.gmail.com, excerpted
below, on Sun, 07 Jun 2009 02:08:30 -0700:
> I like sandwiches too, so perhaps we can have a
> --sudo_make_me_a_sandwich option to emerge?
That'd make a great easter egg option (to go along with "emerge mo
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 4:05 AM, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Alec Warner wrote:
>> On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 4:21 AM, Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
>> wrote:
>> Duncan wrote:
> Patrick Börjesson posted
> 20090529201741.gb11...@nexon.nexus, e
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Duncan schrieb:
> Patrick Börjesson posted
> 20090529201741.gb11...@nexon.nexus, excerpted below, on Fri, 29 May 2009
> 22:17:41 +0200:
>
>> Why exactly would you want to use --oneshot for a "leaf package" that is
>> not depended on by any other pac
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) schrieb:>
>>> Why is a custom set less convenient?
>
> Well, instead of "emerge --trialware package" you would first have to edit
> your
> @trialware set and then "emerge @trialware". The same goes for when you want
> to
> re
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alec Warner wrote:
> On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 4:21 AM, Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
> wrote:
> Duncan wrote:
Patrick Börjesson posted
20090529201741.gb11...@nexon.nexus, excerpted below, on Fri, 29 May 2009
22:17:41 +0200:
> Why ex
Alec Warner posted
b41005390905312058p314e6e1bnda50488d56ba0...@mail.gmail.com, excerpted
below, on Sun, 31 May 2009 20:58:27 -0700:
> On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 4:21 AM, Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
> wrote:
>>
>> I think [trialware install] is an interesting use-case. It would be
>> very simple to ha
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 4:21 AM, Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Duncan wrote:
>> Patrick Börjesson posted
>> 20090529201741.gb11...@nexon.nexus, excerpted below, on Fri, 29 May 2009
>> 22:17:41 +0200:
>>
>>> Why exactly would you want to use
"Marijn Schouten (hkBst)" posted
4a22682a.1050...@gentoo.org, excerpted below, on Sun, 31 May 2009
13:21:14 +0200:
> Duncan wrote:
>> For leaf packages [-1] serves as a sort of test install.
>> Experimental installs and their deps typically sit in the
>> --depclean list for anything from a few
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Duncan wrote:
> Patrick Börjesson posted
> 20090529201741.gb11...@nexon.nexus, excerpted below, on Fri, 29 May 2009
> 22:17:41 +0200:
>
>> Why exactly would you want to use --oneshot for a "leaf package" that is
>> not depended on by any other packa
Patrick Börjesson posted
20090530115251.gc11...@nexon.nexus, excerpted below, on Sat, 30 May 2009
13:52:52 +0200:
> It's a weigh-off between having an easy time pruning your system and
> having emerge calculate a "correct" dependency graph for your entire
> system. As far as emerge is concerned,
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 10:12:43PM +, Duncan wrote:
> Patrick Börjesson posted
> 20090529201741.gb11...@nexon.nexus, excerpted below, on Fri, 29 May 2009
> 22:17:41 +0200:
>
> > Why exactly would you want to use --oneshot for a "leaf package" that is
> > not depended on by any other package
Patrick Börjesson posted
20090529201741.gb11...@nexon.nexus, excerpted below, on Fri, 29 May 2009
22:17:41 +0200:
> Why exactly would you want to use --oneshot for a "leaf package" that is
> not depended on by any other package in the world set? If spam IS
> depended on by any other package (rec
12 matches
Mail list logo
