-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Thursday 01 November 2007, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
>> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> On Wednesday 31 October 2007, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
The immediate motivation of my examining this code was a request on
On Thursday 01 November 2007, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Wednesday 31 October 2007, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
> >> The immediate motivation of my examining this code was a request on
> >> #gentoo-dev-help by lack for something which I could with my new code
>
On Thursday 01 November 2007, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
> Zlin found yet another bug. Since echo "" will output a newline my current
> proposed implementation of useq won't be quiet.
sounds like we should have a testsuite in portage to make sure the misc
variants are operating as expected
-m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
Zlin found yet another bug. Since echo "" will output a newline my current
proposed implementation of useq won't be quiet.
> _use() {
> local flag=$1
> local string_success=$2
> local string_failure=$3
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
> In gambit I used:
>
> econf $(if use static; then echo --disable-shared; else echo --enable-shared;
> fi) \
>
> could become:
>
> econf $(_use static --disable-shared --enable-shared) \
as zlin rightly pointed out o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wednesday 31 October 2007, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
>> I hope this is just an artifact of the patch being a bit opaque. The
>> inconsistent indentation in the patch is a consequence of emacs bash mode
>> using a differe
On Wednesday 31 October 2007, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
> I hope this is just an artifact of the patch being a bit opaque. The
> inconsistent indentation in the patch is a consequence of emacs bash mode
> using a different indentation style than (I guess) vi(m). I'm sure even in
> vi you can r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 October 2007, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
>> The purpose of this patch is to expose a generic function, namely _use,
>> which can be used to build your own use* variant if you need that. I
>> reimplemented all o
On Tuesday 30 October 2007, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
> The purpose of this patch is to expose a generic function, namely _use,
> which can be used to build your own use* variant if you need that. I
> reimplemented all other current use function using _use (and _if) to cut
> out duplicate and
On Tuesday 30 October 2007, Marius Mauch wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 19:32:52 +0100
>
> "Marijn Schouten (hkBst)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > The purpose of this patch is to expose a generic function, namely
> > _use, which can be used t
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 19:32:52 +0100
"Marijn Schouten (hkBst)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> The purpose of this patch is to expose a generic function, namely
> _use, which can be used to build your own use* variant if you need
> that. I reimplemen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The purpose of this patch is to expose a generic function, namely _use, which
can be used to build your own use* variant if you need that. I reimplemented
all other current use function using _use (and _if) to cut out duplicate and
verbose code. Commen
12 matches
Mail list logo
