I have a local mirror for the very same reason. I have put this in my
crontab (all on on one line):
0 6 * * * rsync -rlptDv --delete
ftp.ibiblio.org::linux_distros/gentoo/
/mnt/archive/gentoo/
It runs at six every morning (CET), the load at Ibiblio is quite low
then.
In the /etc/make.conf I m
its either bound by cabling, the servers performance
> (cpu,ram, hard drive speed, dont forget the client's speed) or the switch.
>
> kev
>
> ->-Original Message-
> ->From: Pär Wedin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ->Sent: Saturday, March
Thanks!
You may be right. With 100Mbit switch in between I get ~9MB/s, like you.
Direct connect I get 11-15 MB/s. That's a pretty lousy upgrade. But I
really think I ought to get a 2-3X boost anyway...
Cheers,
Pär.
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003, Richard Revis wrote:
> Sounds like ethernet to me? After a
Thanks for the reply!
I have read the article. According to that article you need about 1 MHz
cpu power per Mbit/s. I should get ca. 700 Mbit/s then, which I don't...
/Pär.
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003, Kevin J. Anderson wrote:
> read the latest article on tomshardware.com on the subject.
>
> kev
--
Thanks!
I use the TPTEST tool from http://sourceforge.net/projects/tptest/
I suspect they do pretty much the same ting. Sorry, I should have posted
that too, of course!
When I recieve 100MB to the server I get 245 Mbit/s and when I send 100 MB
I get 150 Mbit/s. A far cry from 1Gbit/s in other w
Hi all!
I recently upgraded my LAN to gigabit, but so far it's been a disappointment.
It really isn't much faster than it used to be...
If I fetch a large file from my proftpd server I get about 11 MB/s, and the
same file from apache about 15 MB/s. I was hoping for at least twice that.
The ser
