Re: [gentoo-user] 2.6 - Badness in interruptible_sleep_on at kernel

2004-02-05 Thread Guy Van Sanden
I do use nvidia, however they where not yet installed during my test run, so that can't be it... I have XFS compiled in, but I'm not using it, I use reiser only... On Wed, 2004-02-04 at 18:31, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Wed, 04 Feb 2004 18:13:46 +0100 Guy Van Sanden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: |

[gentoo-user] 2.6 - Badness in interruptible_sleep_on at kernel

2004-02-04 Thread Guy Van Sanden
I just had my first attempt at a 2.6 kernel (mm-sources). It seems to work, but this message keeps popping up: Badness in interruptible_sleep_on at kernel/sched.c:2239 Call Trace: [c0124f95] interruptible_sleep_on+0x105/0x110 [c0124b30] default_wake_function+0x0/0x20 [c02c72cb]

Re: [gentoo-user] 2.6 - Badness in interruptible_sleep_on at kernel

2004-02-04 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Wed, 04 Feb 2004 18:13:46 +0100 Guy Van Sanden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | I just had my first attempt at a 2.6 kernel (mm-sources). | | It seems to work, but this message keeps popping up: | | Badness in interruptible_sleep_on at kernel/sched.c:2239 That's *probably* caused by a driver doing