On Saturday 29 January 2005 00:30, Uwe Thiem wrote:
On Saturday 29 January 2005 07:09, William Kenworthy wrote:
On a local lug, a statement was made that not a lot of 64 bit software
is available for the amd chips yet. With gentoo at least, isnt this
largely untrue: if you have the arch
On Saturday 29 January 2005 02:21 pm, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
On Saturday 29 January 2005 00:30, Uwe Thiem wrote:
On Saturday 29 January 2005 07:09, William Kenworthy wrote:
On a local lug, a statement was made that not a lot of 64 bit software
is available for the amd chips yet.
On Saturday 29 January 2005 14:06, Jerry McBride wrote:
On Saturday 29 January 2005 02:21 pm, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
[snip: way too much info on problems converting to 64-bit.]
I bow in your general direction... :')
Sorry, I'm a programmer / standards advocate first, and a gentoo /
On Saturday 29 January 2005 22:51, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
On Saturday 29 January 2005 14:06, Jerry McBride wrote:
On Saturday 29 January 2005 02:21 pm, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
[snip: way too much info on problems converting to 64-bit.]
I bow in your general direction... :')
On a local lug, a statement was made that not a lot of 64 bit software
is available for the amd chips yet. With gentoo at least, isnt this
largely untrue: if you have the arch set correctly, are you not building
64 bit software, and only 32 bit where 32 bit specific instructions are
specified???
On Saturday 29 January 2005 07:09, William Kenworthy wrote:
On a local lug, a statement was made that not a lot of 64 bit software
is available for the amd chips yet. With gentoo at least, isnt this
largely untrue: if you have the arch set correctly, are you not building
64 bit software, and
William Kenworthy wrote:
On a local lug, a statement was made that not a lot of 64 bit software
is available for the amd chips yet. With gentoo at least, isnt this
largely untrue: if you have the arch set correctly, are you not building
64 bit software, and only 32 bit where 32 bit specific
