Re: [gentoo-user] An ebuild to stable.

2005-02-02 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 20:23:07 -0600 Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | Right, but this doesn't happen automatically, AFAIK. A request on | b.g.o could help, esp. if the ebuild has been forgotten. It's | unlikely that an ebuild goes stable before 30 days are up, sincethat | is

[gentoo-user] An ebuild to stable.

2005-02-01 Thread Pupeno
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Is there a place where I can recomend/ask for an ebuild to become stable (x86 instead of ~x86) ? Thanks. - -- Pupeno: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://pupeno.com Reading Science Fiction ? http://sfreaders.com.ar -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version:

Re: [gentoo-user] An ebuild to stable.

2005-02-01 Thread Nick Rout
bugs.gentoo.org On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 20:30:41 + Pupeno [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Is there a place where I can recomend/ask for an ebuild to become stable (x86 instead of ~x86) ? Thanks. - -- Pupeno: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://pupeno.com

Re: [gentoo-user] An ebuild to stable.

2005-02-01 Thread Holly Bostick
Nick Rout wrote: bugs.gentoo.org On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 20:30:41 + Pupeno [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Is there a place where I can recomend/ask for an ebuild to become stable (x86 instead of ~x86) ? Thanks. - -- Doesn't this to some degree depend on

Re: [gentoo-user] An ebuild to stable.

2005-02-01 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
On Tuesday 01 February 2005 06:37 pm, Holly Bostick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nick Rout wrote: On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 20:30:41 + Pupeno [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there a place where I can recomend/ask for an ebuild to become stable (x86 instead of ~x86) ? bugs.gentoo.org Doesn't