Re: [gentoo-user] Non root build

2003-02-20 Thread Arturo di Gioia
On Thu, 2003-02-20 at 16:14, Jonathan Chocron wrote: > >From what I got, the new portage still cannot be > launched from a non-root account, it compiles as > portage:portage, but you still need to be root to > emerge a package. > Good. I knew it shouldn't be possible to install something without

Re: [gentoo-user] Non root build

2003-02-20 Thread Jonathan Chocron
>From what I got, the new portage still cannot be launched from a non-root account, it compiles as portage:portage, but you still need to be root to emerge a package. Jonathan --- "Matthias F. Brandstetter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > On Wednesday 19 February 2003 10:22, Arturo di Gioia > wr

Re: [gentoo-user] Non root build

2003-02-19 Thread Matthias F. Brandstetter
On Wednesday 19 February 2003 10:22, Arturo di Gioia wrote: > Yesterday I updated portage to version 2.0.47-r2. > It suggested me to add a 'portage' group to allow non root build. > Unfortunately it didn't give any more information. I tried it (I > created the portage group and added my user to it)

Re: [gentoo-user] Non root build

2003-02-19 Thread Joe Stone
hi ! have you played with userpriv and usersandbox features in make.conf? part of portage-2.0.47-r2.ebuild: The 2.0.47 line of portages contains an optional userpriv mode that enables portage to drop root privleges and run as a normal user. It is enabled via FEATURES by adding userpriv. ciao Joe

[gentoo-user] Non root build

2003-02-19 Thread Arturo di Gioia
Yesterday I updated portage to version 2.0.47-r2. It suggested me to add a 'portage' group to allow non root build. Unfortunately it didn't give any more information. I tried it (I created the portage group and added my user to it). It doesn't work (portage still requires root privileges to fetch a