Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [gentoo-dev] Distro Day (Measuring thebenefits of the Gentoo approach)

2003-08-14 Thread Christopher Egner
Sorry about the double post. I think that was an example of evolution trying to be smart. So it swas going to email alan (changed that to gentoo-user) but I think it was also sending it to the list but not showing me -- Christopher In 1968 it took the computing power of 2 C-64's to fly a rocket

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [gentoo-dev] Distro Day (Measuring thebenefits of the Gentoo approach)

2003-08-14 Thread Bill Kenworthy
prelink was used, but not grsecurity - just turned on what was needed. Kernel was modular, which is supposed to make a slight slowdown. On Thu, 2003-08-14 at 06:18, Spider wrote: I'm wiping this whole message since I'm not about to go and dwell on the Its very interesting that you don't

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [gentoo-dev] Distro Day (Measuring thebenefits of the Gentoo approach)

2003-08-14 Thread Spider
I'm wiping this whole message since I'm not about to go and dwell on the finer points of delivery here. :) Now, I for one would be -VERY- interested in seeing same system comparsion between the flags: -Os -O2 and -O3 (on the same -march= ) for a single system. i realize this takes a lot

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [gentoo-dev] Distro Day (Measuring thebenefits of the Gentoo approach)

2003-08-14 Thread Spider
begin quote On Wed, 13 Aug 2003 15:56:28 -0700 Riyad Kalla [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You can get a gist of this (not necessarily benchmarks, but stability results) in the CFLags central thread. It took me the better part of 3 Well, I have the gist of it, more or less ;-) As regards to