On Wed, 2005-03-02 at 20:21 -0800, Jonathan Nichols wrote:
> Ow Mun Heng wrote:
> > On Wed, 2005-03-02 at 16:13 -0500, Thomas Kirchner wrote:
> >
> >>* On Mar 2 21:50, Matthias F. Brandstetter (gentoo-user@gentoo.org) wrote:
> >>
> >>>after upgrading SA to version 3 I now do get lots of false neg
Ow Mun Heng wrote:
On Wed, 2005-03-02 at 16:13 -0500, Thomas Kirchner wrote:
* On Mar 2 21:50, Matthias F. Brandstetter (gentoo-user@gentoo.org) wrote:
after upgrading SA to version 3 I now do get lots of false negative. I
trained my filter via "sa-learn", and many of these FP do have "BAYES_99",
On Wed, 2005-03-02 at 16:13 -0500, Thomas Kirchner wrote:
> * On Mar 2 21:50, Matthias F. Brandstetter (gentoo-user@gentoo.org) wrote:
> > after upgrading SA to version 3 I now do get lots of false negative. I
> > trained my filter via "sa-learn", and many of these FP do have "BAYES_99",
> > but
-- quoting Thomas Kirchner --
> In your ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs file, add some lines like the
> following, for whatever tests you want to modify:
>
> score BAYES_50 1.0
> score BAYES_60 1.5
> score BAYES_80 2.5
> score BAYES_95 4.0
> score BAYES_99 4.5
thanks, that did the trick
* On Mar 2 21:50, Matthias F. Brandstetter (gentoo-user@gentoo.org) wrote:
> after upgrading SA to version 3 I now do get lots of false negative. I
> trained my filter via "sa-learn", and many of these FP do have "BAYES_99",
> but they do not reach 5.0 points.
In your ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs