William Kenworthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I dont regard this as a free speech issue, but about common decency.
As do I. I might be annoyed by people using bad language, too, (not
necessarily "bad" words, but when people don't bother to express their
problems/opinions understandably), but I
I have to agree with you. I had to solve this prob for my business. Ppl seemed
to ignore me on it so I posted that for everytime they say f@@k or some
dirivative or come in drunk or high it will cost them $5.00 each time. Of
course i work at home so I do tend to take it personally.
On Saturday
On Sat, 8 Nov 2003 23:55:41 -0500, Ernie Schroder wrote:
> I "pee" people off.
>
Hey guys, is there no other mailing list for stuff like that ?
To the others:
Thanks to all of you helping hands, this mailing list seems to
become 'my intelligent gentoo handbook'. :)
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mail
I will support you as language like that is not acceptable on a list
where children may be present. I dont know what society (...
overprotected daughters!) some of these people belong to ... its not one
I would like widely emulated. I am surprised that more people have not
spoken up: not about th
On Saturday 08 November 2003 09:01 pm, Björn Lindström wrote:
> Ernie Schroder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > #2. I did not berate him. I merely pointed out that I and perhaps
> > others find his choice of words unexceptable.
>
> If that was actually your intention, you should have mailed him
> pe
Ernie Schroder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> #2. I did not berate him. I merely pointed out that I and perhaps
> others find his choice of words unexceptable.
If that was actually your intention, you should have mailed him
personally, and not the list. (Maybe you think I should heed my own
advic
Björn Lindström:
> I'm pretty sure that what words I use or not has nothing to
> do with my ethics. Seeing the word CENSORED hasn't harmed
> anyone. If you think you (or your over-protected daughters)
> might be the first, then make a appropriate procmail rule,
> and stop buggering us about it.
"Chris Carter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Here's a new concept for you: If you want people to respect you, then
> try to respect them. If you don't respect others, you deserve what you
> get. It's your choice.
>
> In public, people normally follow a code of rules called 'ethics'. In
> private y
