On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 08:05:21PM +0100, Alexander Futasz wrote:
[skpd]
> > I would be perfectly happy if there were a 'USE' flag that turns this
> > 'RootCommand' on. This way one would be forced to read about it before
> > enabling it and thus learn what the consequences are.
>
> Yeah maybe.
On Sat, 31 Jan 2004 12:34:31 -0500, Andrey Kartashov wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 12:51:42AM -0500, Andrey Kartashov wrote:
> > > > I'm using blackbox wm and have noticed that the styles don't set
> > > > the root window background because the feature is disabled by
> > > > the
> > > >
>
On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 07:55:05AM +0100, LJN wrote:
> On Sat, 2004-01-31 at 08:49, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 12:51:42AM -0500, Andrey Kartashov wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi, all!
> > >
> > > I'm using blackbox wm and have noticed that the styles don't set the root
> > > windo
On Sat, 2004-01-31 at 08:49, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 12:51:42AM -0500, Andrey Kartashov wrote:
> >
> > Hi, all!
> >
> > I'm using blackbox wm and have noticed that the styles don't set the root
> > window background because the feature is disabled by the
> >
> > epatc
On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 12:51:42AM -0500, Andrey Kartashov wrote:
>
> Hi, all!
>
> I'm using blackbox wm and have noticed that the styles don't set the root
> window background because the feature is disabled by the
>
> epatch ${FILESDIR}/disable_rootcommand.patch
>
> The warning message says:
Hi, all!
I'm using blackbox wm and have noticed that the styles don't set the root
window background because the feature is disabled by the
epatch ${FILESDIR}/disable_rootcommand.patch
The warning message says:
ewarn "RootCommand is now DISABLED to close a large"
ewarn "security hole."
I'm t
