Grendel wrote:
On Sun, 8 Feb 2004, Arne Vogel wrote:
Grendel wrote:
If you have loaded them then you should get the inrromation, just type
/usr/bin/sensors and tell us the output. Please tell your motherboard
model as well. Also make sure that you have the latest 2.8.3 IIRC version
of
On Sun, 8 Feb 2004, Arne Vogel wrote:
> Grendel wrote:
>
> >If you have loaded them then you should get the inrromation, just type
> >/usr/bin/sensors and tell us the output. Please tell your motherboard
> >model as well. Also make sure that you have the latest 2.8.3 IIRC version
> >of the lm_
Grendel wrote:
If you have loaded them then you should get the inrromation, just type
/usr/bin/sensors and tell us the output. Please tell your motherboard
model as well. Also make sure that you have the latest 2.8.3 IIRC version
of the lm_sensors userspace tools.
It's lm-sensors (with hyphe
On Friday 06 February 2004 06:39 pm, Peter Ruskin wrote:
> On Friday 06 Feb 2004 23:21, Ernie Schroder wrote:
> > Peter,
> > I don't seem to have a /sysfs Is this a kernel option? If
> > so where?I do see a seemingly unrelated SYSV_FS
>
> It's called /sys.
>
> I think that got installed wit
On Saturday 07 Feb 2004 00:03, Grendel wrote:
> Well, the 2.6 kernels includes all the latest i2c modules, so you
> will need only the i2c userspace tools.
>
> This is generic instructions.
> Download lm_sensors-2.8.3.tar.gz and extract it, cd into the
> directory, type
> make user && make
Grendel wrote:
On Fri, 6 Feb 2004, Manuel McLure wrote:
Here's my lsmod:
ulthar root # lsmod
Module Size Used by
eeprom 6216 0
via686a18248 0
i2c_sensor 2368 2 eeprom,via686a
i2c_isa 1664 0
i2c_viapro
On Fri, 6 Feb 2004, Manuel McLure wrote:
>
> OK... I found info on the lm-sensors homepage - seems that you can't
> load both i2c_viapro and via686a at the same time under 2.6.1 (even
> though sensors-detect recommends it). If I leave i2c_viapro off the list
> then things work.
Ahh..I see
On Fri, 6 Feb 2004, Manuel McLure wrote:
> Here's my lsmod:
> ulthar root # lsmod
> Module Size Used by
> eeprom 6216 0
> via686a18248 0
> i2c_sensor 2368 2 eeprom,via686a
> i2c_isa 1664 0
> i2c_viapro
Manuel McLure wrote:
Grendel wrote:
On Fri, 6 Feb 2004, Manuel McLure wrote:
Peter Ruskin wrote:
On Friday 06 Feb 2004 23:21, Ernie Schroder wrote:
Peter,
I don't seem to have a /sysfs Is this a kernel option? If so
where?I do see a seemingly unrelated SYSV_FS
It's called /sys.
I th
Grendel wrote:
On Fri, 6 Feb 2004, Manuel McLure wrote:
Peter Ruskin wrote:
On Friday 06 Feb 2004 23:21, Ernie Schroder wrote:
Peter,
I don't seem to have a /sysfs Is this a kernel option? If so
where?I do see a seemingly unrelated SYSV_FS
It's called /sys.
I think that got installed
On Fri, 6 Feb 2004, Manuel McLure wrote:
> Peter Ruskin wrote:
>
> > On Friday 06 Feb 2004 23:21, Ernie Schroder wrote:
> >
> >>Peter,
> >>I don't seem to have a /sysfs Is this a kernel option? If so
> >>where?I do see a seemingly unrelated SYSV_FS
> >
> >
> > It's called /sys.
> >
>
Peter Ruskin wrote:
On Friday 06 Feb 2004 23:21, Ernie Schroder wrote:
Peter,
I don't seem to have a /sysfs Is this a kernel option? If so
where?I do see a seemingly unrelated SYSV_FS
It's called /sys.
I think that got installed with the 2.6 kernels. If you have gkrellm2
that should f
On Fri, 6 Feb 2004, Ernie Schroder wrote:
> On Monday 05 January 2004 10:13 pm, Peter Ruskin wrote:
> > As you may have found out, you can't emerge i2c or lm_sensors if
> > you're running a 2.6 kernel. This is my experience of hardware
> > monitoring with 2.6. I hope it may be of some help.
> >
On Fri, 6 Feb 2004, Peter Ruskin wrote:
> On Friday 06 Feb 2004 23:21, Ernie Schroder wrote:
> > Peter,
> > I don't seem to have a /sysfs Is this a kernel option? If so
> > where?I do see a seemingly unrelated SYSV_FS
>
> It's called /sys.
>
> I think that got installed with the 2.6 kern
On Friday 06 Feb 2004 23:21, Ernie Schroder wrote:
> Peter,
> I don't seem to have a /sysfs Is this a kernel option? If so
> where?I do see a seemingly unrelated SYSV_FS
It's called /sys.
I think that got installed with the 2.6 kernels. If you have gkrellm2
that should find the sensors
On Monday 05 January 2004 10:13 pm, Peter Ruskin wrote:
> As you may have found out, you can't emerge i2c or lm_sensors if
> you're running a 2.6 kernel. This is my experience of hardware
> monitoring with 2.6. I hope it may be of some help.
>
> From http://lwn.net/Articles/56146/
> Improved sys
As you may have found out, you can't emerge i2c or lm_sensors if you're
running a 2.6 kernel. This is my experience of hardware monitoring
with 2.6. I hope it may be of some help.
From http://lwn.net/Articles/56146/
Improved system monitoring.
~~~
- lm_sensors.
-
17 matches
Mail list logo
