One thing that might be happening is a bottleneck at the PCI bus. I read
somewhere that if you use 2 100BaseT cards on each end, with each connected
to a switch so there were no packet collisions on the wire, you could get
better throughput by channel bonding. I haven't tried it though.
Jim
My personal experience is that on two IBM 305 gigabit Px2GHz servers
using something like
dd if=/dev/zero | nc slave 1234 on master
and nc -l -p 1234 | dd of=/dev/null on slave
so no hard disk bottleneck
We had not more than 60Mb/sec with a 100% CPU utilization (35Mb sec on
Pär Wedin wrote:
Hi all!
I recently upgraded my LAN to gigabit, but so far it's been a disappointment.
It really isn't much faster than it used to be...
If I fetch a large file from my proftpd server I get about 11 MB/s, and the
same file from apache about 15 MB/s. I was hoping for at least
Hi all!
I recently upgraded my LAN to gigabit, but so far it's been a disappointment.
It really isn't much faster than it used to be...
If I fetch a large file from my proftpd server I get about 11 MB/s, and the
same file from apache about 15 MB/s. I was hoping for at least twice that.
The
On Sat, 2003-03-08 at 16:41, Pär Wedin wrote:
Hi all!
I recently upgraded my LAN to gigabit, but so far it's been a disappointment.
It really isn't much faster than it used to be...
If I fetch a large file from my proftpd server I get about 11 MB/s, and the
same file from apache about
On Sat, 2003-03-08 at 17:11, Arturo di Gioia wrote:
I think a program like TTCP could help you testing your true bandwidth
http://www.pcausa.com/Utilities/pcattcp.htm
ARGH! I just realized that I pointed you to a Windows version!
Shame on me. By the way, Google should be your friend
read the latest article on tomshardware.com on the subject.
kev
--Original Message-
-From: Pär Wedin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2003 10:41 AM
-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Subject: [gentoo-user] Slow gigabit...
-
-
-Hi all!
-
-I recently upgraded my LAN to gigabit
