- Original Message -
From: "Gerhard W.Gruber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2003 12:52 PM
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] WAS "A good book on C programming", now an
APPOLOGY
On Sun, 28 Dec 2003 12:12:56 +0100, "S
After all the language C++
requires some hardware to operate which means that it requires a motherboard
wich means that is the proper ng to ask for motherboard stuff.
Weird, I just wrote com C++ code for the motorola ColdFire processor and
I didn't need a motherboard to run it ;)
All in good
On Sun, 28 Dec 2003 12:12:56 +0100
"SN" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Scott Jackson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, December 27, 2003 6:19 PM
> Subject: Re:
On Sun, 28 Dec 2003 12:12:56 +0100, "SN" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> you know, if you wanted to get a developer's opinion, there IS a
>"gentoo-devel" list :-P
>> this is gentoo-user...
>
>So you have to be on the developer list to be a developer? Funny very funny.
No. But the attitude of the or
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Jackson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, December 27, 2003 6:19 PM
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] WAS "A good book on C programming", now an
APPOLOGY
> you know, if you wanted to get a deve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 27 Dec 2003 5:19 pm, Scott Jackson wrote:
> you know, if you wanted to get a developer's opinion, there IS a
> "gentoo-devel" list :-P this is gentoo-user...
I will post to that as well then. Thanks.
> On Sat, 27 Dec 2003 21:43:17 +
you know, if you wanted to get a developer's opinion, there IS a "gentoo-devel" list
:-P
this is gentoo-user...
On Sat, 27 Dec 2003 21:43:17 +
Gavin Henry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Dear Everyone,
>
> I was had this pointed out to me,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear Everyone,
I was had this pointed out to me, by Simon Perreault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(with my reply):
"On Saturday 27 Dec 2003 8:49 pm, you wrote:
> 1) Please do not cross-post. (This means sending the same message to many
> lists.)
OK, guilty,