Re: [gentoo-user] Why are masked ebuilds masked?

2003-10-15 Thread Azhdeen
On Wednesday 15 October 2003 23:52, Roger Miliker wrote: > I hope I answered your question err... yes > > peace, oops. i gotta stop to think before clicking "Send"... -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] Why are masked ebuilds masked?

2003-10-15 Thread Roger Miliker
On Wednesday 15 October 2003 21:23, Azhdeen wrote: > On Wednesday 15 October 2003 12:53, Roger Miliker wrote: > > I'd say they are ~x86 which means 'testing'. > > > > [...] > > err... the question was "WHY" > > i don't know the answer, but i'm also interested in the answer, if it > exists. > >

Re: [gentoo-user] Why are masked ebuilds masked?

2003-10-15 Thread Azhdeen
On Wednesday 15 October 2003 12:53, Roger Miliker wrote: > I'd say they are ~x86 which means 'testing'. > > [...] err... the question was "WHY" i don't know the answer, but i'm also interested in the answer, if it exists. like Rick, i know where to find the masked packages, or mask some more,

Re: [gentoo-user] Why are masked ebuilds masked?

2003-10-15 Thread Roger Miliker
On Wednesday 15 October 2003 11:03, Rick [Kitty5] wrote: > Silly question, Where can I find out why an ebuild is masked, for example > abcde 2.0.3 is the latest unmasked version, ebuilds up to 2.1.6 exist, > what's wrong with them? > > Rick > I'd say they are ~x86 which means 'testing'. ACCEPT_KE

[gentoo-user] Why are masked ebuilds masked?

2003-10-15 Thread Rick [Kitty5]
Silly question, Where can I find out why an ebuild is masked, for example abcde 2.0.3 is the latest unmasked version, ebuilds up to 2.1.6 exist, what's wrong with them? Rick Kitty5 NewMedia http://Kitty5.com POV-Ray News & Resources http://Povray.co.uk TEL : +44 (01270) 501101 - ICQ : 15776037 P