Re: [gentoo-user] db-3.2.9 upgrade in stable world

2003-09-09 Thread Thomas T. Veldhouse
You are correct. It was marked for upgrade and that is what threw me. It really should be marked as New I think. Tom Veldhouse - Original Message - From: "Chris I" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 11:42 AM Subject: Re:

Re: [gentoo-user] db-3.2.9 upgrade in stable world

2003-09-09 Thread Chris I
On 2003.09.09 12:34, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote: I noticed this today: [ebuild U ] sys-libs/db-4.0.14-r2 [3.2.9-r7] This seems strange to me. It seems that these should coexist on the same system, not one replace the other. It also seems like this upgrade could cause some major compatibility

[gentoo-user] db-3.2.9 upgrade in stable world

2003-09-09 Thread Thomas T. Veldhouse
I noticed this today: [ebuild U ] sys-libs/db-4.0.14-r2 [3.2.9-r7] This seems strange to me. It seems that these should coexist on the same system, not one replace the other. It also seems like this upgrade could cause some major compatibility issues. Comments? Tom Veldhouse -- [EMAIL P