* On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 09:38:23 -0400, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
I'd like to vote that a distcc howto get some space in the official
install documentation... Lots of people are using it, and there is a lot
of confusion (and wrong information) on how to use it.
Although there is a bit on
I keep getting all your replies to the gentoo-user group, but no one
else's. Can you please take me out of your address list.
On Fri, 2003-08-08 at 06:00, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote:
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 04:20:48AM +0200, Jens Mayer wrote:
* On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 09:38:23 -0400,
Hi,
my home network consists of 1 Athlon XP 1800 and a P120 Server.
So I thought I would give distcc a try (maybe not a bad idea :).
What I want is: Everything should be compiled on the fast Athlon machine.
I got this setup working, but I still have a few questions:
first of all, the relevant
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 01:14:42PM +0200, Jens Mayer wrote:
* On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 12:00:16 +0200, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote:
Logically, I'd say you need ccache on the host piloting the build: ccache
caches the results of preprocessing (or rather a hash thereof) and distcc
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 01:46:05PM +0200, Jens Mayer wrote:
That sounds logical to me, too. Thanks for the clarification, I will
try this the next too hot evening I can't sleep at night (it's about
30°C at midnight in Mannheim, Germany). ;)
You're lucky it's about 35 in Paris, France :(
I'd like to vote that a distcc howto get some space in the official
install documentation... Lots of people are using it, and there is a lot
of confusion (and wrong information) on how to use it. Just do a search
on google for distcc gentoo and you'll find lots of ways that don't
work. Plus
On a side note, I want to confirm if one of my assumptions about distcc
is correct. When I have my Athlon Tbird desktop doing all the
compilations for my Intel P4 laptop, all the cross-compilation stuff is
handled automatically, correct?
Tom
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 04:20:48AM +0200, Jens Mayer wrote:
* On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 09:38:23 -0400, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
I'd like to vote that a distcc howto get some space in the official
install documentation... Lots of people are using it, and there is a lot
of confusion (and
How reliable *is* the usage of distcc?
I keep reading comments saying that not all packages can be compiled with
discc and such.
Gus
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
* On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 13:45:15 +0200, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote:
Hmm.. you had me doubting there for a minute :)
Sorry. ;)
I'm still pretty sure that ccache should be run only on the driving client,
and should be driving distcc as compiler.. let's see..
From
begin quote
On Thu, 07 Aug 2003 13:09:39 +0200
Ole Langbehn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why theese instead ofFEATURES=distcc ??
CC=distcc
CXX=distcc g++
you mean the lines above or below? I'm guessing the CC and CXX lines.
Cause I already have distcc in FEATURES.
then
begin quote
On Fri, 8 Aug 2003 13:46:23 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How reliable *is* the usage of distcc?
Generally its quite reliable. As we find packages that don't build using
it we can excempt them manually.
As a rule. try it, then try it again (could just be a broken Makefile
that
begin quote
On Thu, 07 Aug 2003 11:21:25 +0200
Ole Langbehn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
my home network consists of 1 Athlon XP 1800 and a P120 Server.
So I thought I would give distcc a try (maybe not a bad idea :).
What I want is: Everything should be compiled on the fast Athlon
Spider wrote:
#distcc
DISTCC_HOSTS=localhost
DISTCC_VERBOSE=1
MAKEOPTS=-j2
Why theese instead ofFEATURES=distcc ??
CC=distcc
CXX=distcc g++
you mean the lines above or below? I'm guessing the CC and CXX lines.
Cause I already have distcc in FEATURES.
With this setup, both
14 matches
Mail list logo
