Valmor de Almeida wrote:
Is there a reason for g77 be installed in
/usr/i686-pc-linux-gnu/gcc-bin/3.2/g77
and not in say /usr/bin/g77 ?
Also why g++ in
/usr/bin/g++
is different from
/usr/i686-pc-linux-gnu/gcc-bin/3.2/g++ ?
I wonder whether this is particular for my
On Feb 5, 2004, at 6:30 am, Valmor de Almeida wrote:
Is there a reason for g77 be installed in
/usr/i686-pc-linux-gnu/gcc-bin/3.2/g77
and not in say /usr/bin/g77 ?
I'm not sure if this is the only reason, but I think labelling the
compiler toolchain with the architecture--system-version allows
Hi
Valmor de Almeida wrote:
Also why g++ in
/usr/bin/g++
is different from
/usr/i686-pc-linux-gnu/gcc-bin/3.2/g++ ?
/usr/bin/g++ looks like a wrapper script. Its not actually a script though,
its a compiled program. But this is why i make my assumptions:
# strings /usr/bin/g++
On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 01:38:54PM +, Stroller wrote:
On Feb 5, 2004, at 6:30 am, Valmor de Almeida wrote:
Is there a reason for g77 be installed in
/usr/i686-pc-linux-gnu/gcc-bin/3.2/g77
and not in say /usr/bin/g77 ?
I'm not sure if this is the only reason, but I think labelling
This is interesting. I typically use etcat and
bash-2.05b# etcat -b /usr/bin/etcat
Searching for /usr/bin/etcat in * ...
app-portage/gentoolkit-0.1.38
but
bash-2.05b# etcat -b /usr/sbin/qpkg
Searching for /usr/sbin/qpkg in * ...
results in nothing.
I wasn't aware of qpkg.
--
Valmor
Is there a reason for g77 be installed in
/usr/i686-pc-linux-gnu/gcc-bin/3.2/g77
and not in say /usr/bin/g77 ?
Also why g++ in
/usr/bin/g++
is different from
/usr/i686-pc-linux-gnu/gcc-bin/3.2/g++ ?
I wonder whether this is particular for my installation.
Thanks for any
