On Sunday 16 February 2003 14:22, gabriel wrote:
> http://cvs.gentoo.org/~satai/sgmlfix.html
>
> that fixt everything for me
Didn't help me, but reading that and related bugs brought up the question
of what, exactly, the "doc" useflag does. I had enabled it, because I
generally think
On February 16, 2003 10:03 am, Johannes Zweng wrote:
> Look also at this bug-report and the comments:
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15270
the above bug has a link to:
http://cvs.gentoo.org/~satai/sgmlfix.html
that fixt everything for me
--
with our basic freedom in stake, no resp
[Note: I didn't follow the whole thread, got only this mail, because
I've just subscribed this list.]
Carl Hudkins wrote:
> On Monday 10 February 2003 16:47, Alcino Dall'Igna Junior wrote:
>
> > -- Installing ./html/up.png
> > -- Installing ./html/index.sgml
> > /bin/install: cannot stat `./html
On Monday 10 February 2003 16:47, Alcino Dall'Igna Junior wrote:
> -- Installing ./html/up.png
> -- Installing ./html/index.sgml
> /bin/install: cannot stat `./html/index.sgml': No such file or
> directory make[4]: *** [install-data-local] Error 1
Same thing happening here... hm, this upg
Anyone see this before?
Many packages present this problem, I unpack the tarball againd do a
make, ebuild package, ..., and all goes fine. OK when there are 1
or 2 packages to build, but when trying to build gnome 2.2 it's more
dificult.
It seems that someone es killing index.sgml (or not bu
