Rebuild kernel with:
CONFIG_FILTER=y
It's used for attack filter to any socket, used by the program.
On 16:07 Wed 19 Nov , Jason Stubbs wrote:
On Wednesday 19 November 2003 14:24, Thomas Smith wrote:
I've had Gentoo setup and running on a test server for about a month now
and didn't
Jason Stubbs wrote:
On Wednesday 19 November 2003 14:24, Thomas Smith wrote:
I've had Gentoo setup and running on a test server for about a month now
and didn't notice any of these errors until I configured Nagios--it
immediately started reporting WARNINGs regarding this error.. I've
googled
On Wednesday 19 November 2003 16:02, Selentek 24331-03 wrote:
On 16:07 Wed 19 Nov , Jason Stubbs wrote:
On Wednesday 19 November 2003 14:24, Thomas Smith wrote:
I've had Gentoo setup and running on a test server for about a month
now and didn't notice any of these errors until I
Sorry,
s/attack/attach/
On 00:33 Wed 19 Nov , Thomas Smith wrote:
Jason Stubbs wrote:
On Wednesday 19 November 2003 14:24, Thomas Smith wrote:
I've had Gentoo setup and running on a test server for about a month now
and didn't notice any of these errors until I configured
my kernel is 2.4.20-gentoo-r8,
I don't know where is this option is 2.6,
but the mesage from ping without with option was: WARNING: failed to install socket
filter.
On 16:35 Wed 19 Nov , Jason Stubbs wrote:
On Wednesday 19 November 2003 16:02, Selentek 24331-03 wrote:
On 16:07 Wed 19 Nov
On Wednesday 19 November 2003 16:33, Thomas Smith wrote:
I'm going to investigate the previous post regarding CONFIG_FILTER=y.
I'm not quite sure what the poster meant by It's used for attack filter
to any socket, used by the program.
read attack as attach
Jason
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing
I've had Gentoo setup and running on a test server for about a month now
and didn't notice any of these errors until I configured Nagios--it
immediately started reporting WARNINGs regarding this error.. I've
googled for this problem and every body seems to agree that it's an
issue with the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thanks for information,
sure
PS: Is vlan+vconfig right solution to reject arp requests ?
I'm not sure totaly what you mean by vlan+vconfig. You could specify an
iptables mechanism to reject arp protocols and there may be some kernel ip
Thanks for information,
PS: Is vlan+vconfig right solution to reject arp requests ?
On 12:00 Thu 23 Oct , Daniel wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet
HWaddr 00:02:B3:50:88:D3 inet addr:5.5.5.98 Bcast:5.5.5.255
inet addr:5.5.5.98
Hello,
Network question:
I have a computer with two network devices: eth0, eth1
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet
HWaddr 00:02:B3:50:88:D3 inet addr:5.5.5.98 Bcast:5.5.5.255
inet addr:5.5.5.98 Bcast:5.5.5.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
Mask:255.255.255.0 UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 12:31:55 +0400
Selentek 24331-03 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Network question:
I have a computer with two network devices: eth0, eth1
...
Question: Why pinging 192.168.1.12 from 5.5.5.138 is Ok ?
tcpdump of .12
sudo /usr/sbin/tcpdump -f -i eth0 icmp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet
HWaddr 00:02:B3:50:88:D3 inet addr:5.5.5.98 Bcast:5.5.5.255
inet addr:5.5.5.98 Bcast:5.5.5.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
Mask:255.255.255.0 UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
eth1 Link encap:Ethernet
Hello, Collegues!
I have one small question. I can not understand where I do something
wrong?
After last update of system (emerge -u system) I can see
this thing:
$ ping some.host.name
PING some.host.name (xx.xx.xx.xx) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from some.host.name (xx.xx.xx.xx):
hello!
some hours ago i upgraded a lot of stable packets to their new versions
which became stable yesterday night.
(including baselayout)
since then:
ping is missing.
umlauts don't work in midnight commander.
and instead of a colored bash prompt in kde konsole/xterm there is only
bash-2.05b$
14 matches
Mail list logo
