On Sat, 2005-04-02 at 14:26 -0800, Grant wrote:
> > Related to hacking the script, you can download the revdep-rebuild from
> > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62644 which is a little bit
> > smarter and a lot more configurable. Make sure to read through the bug
> > to see the new features
> > | > | > | I always get the same thing from revdep-rebuild, no matter how
> > | > | > | many times it emerges blackdown-jdk:
> > | > | >
> > | > | > This is one of the many reasons you shouldn't use binary
> > | > | > packages.
> > | > |
> > | > | I didn't think I was. I don't think I've ever u
John Myers wrote:
>On Thursday 31 March 2005 11:49, Grant wrote:
>
>
>>>| > | I always get the same thing from revdep-rebuild, no matter how
>>>| > | many times it emerges blackdown-jdk:
>>>| >
>>>| > This is one of the many reasons you shouldn't use binary packages.
>>>|
>>>| I didn't think I w
On Thu, 2005-03-31 at 21:34 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 11:49:16 -0800 Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | > | > | I always get the same thing from revdep-rebuild, no matter how
> | > | > | many times it emerges blackdown-jdk:
> | > | >
> | > | > This is one of the many rea
> | > | > | I always get the same thing from revdep-rebuild, no matter how
> | > | > | many times it emerges blackdown-jdk:
> | > | >
> | > | > This is one of the many reasons you shouldn't use binary
> | > | > packages.
> | > |
> | > | I didn't think I was. I don't think I've ever used an 'emerge
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 11:49:16 -0800 Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > | > | I always get the same thing from revdep-rebuild, no matter how
| > | > | many times it emerges blackdown-jdk:
| > | >
| > | > This is one of the many reasons you shouldn't use binary
| > | > packages.
| > |
| > | I didn't
On Thursday 31 March 2005 11:49, Grant wrote:
> > | > | I always get the same thing from revdep-rebuild, no matter how
> > | > | many times it emerges blackdown-jdk:
> > | >
> > | > This is one of the many reasons you shouldn't use binary packages.
> > |
> > | I didn't think I was. I don't think I
> | > | I always get the same thing from revdep-rebuild, no matter how
> | > | many times it emerges blackdown-jdk:
> | >
> | > This is one of the many reasons you shouldn't use binary packages.
> |
> | I didn't think I was. I don't think I've ever used an 'emerge -K'
> | command.
>
> Blackdown i
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 10:52:55 -0800 Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > | I always get the same thing from revdep-rebuild, no matter how
| > | many times it emerges blackdown-jdk:
| >
| > This is one of the many reasons you shouldn't use binary packages.
|
| I didn't think I was. I don't think I
> | I always get the same thing from revdep-rebuild, no matter how many
> | times it emerges blackdown-jdk:
>
> This is one of the many reasons you shouldn't use binary packages.
I didn't think I was. I don't think I've ever used an 'emerge -K' command.
- Grant
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 09:59:50 -0800 Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| I always get the same thing from revdep-rebuild, no matter how many
| times it emerges blackdown-jdk:
This is one of the many reasons you shouldn't use binary packages.
--
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Fluxbox, shel
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 09:59:50 -0800, Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I always get the same thing from revdep-rebuild, no matter how many
> times it emerges blackdown-jdk:
>
> Checking dynamic linking consistency...
> ^T broken /opt/blackdown-jdk-1.4.2.01/jre/lib/i386/libjsoundalsa.so
> (require
I always get the same thing from revdep-rebuild, no matter how many
times it emerges blackdown-jdk:
Checking dynamic linking consistency...
^T broken /opt/blackdown-jdk-1.4.2.01/jre/lib/i386/libjsoundalsa.so
(requires libasound.so.2)
done.
(/root/.revdep-rebuild.3_rebuild)
I'm totally current
13 matches
Mail list logo
