What does your /var/log/Xorg.0.log read?
Does it actually load the glx extension or fail for
some reason?
Also, double check that you are using the opengl
use-flag. I think it enables mesa since your video
card doesn;t support ×ר×.
Good luck
Ben
--- Michael Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
Hi,
On occasion I get a bit of cruft on my system. So I do the emerge -Pp
world to see what can be removed. I wanted some opinions on this list:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] / # emerge -Pp world
>
> >>> These are the packages that would be unmerged:
>
> app-text/docbook-sgml-dtd
> selected: 4.4 4.1
Thomas Kear wrote:
> # echo "www-client/mozilla-1.7.13" >>
> /etc/portage/profile/package.provided
> # emerge -C mozilla
> # emerge seamonkey
>
> Should do it.
>
> If you're attached to mozilla just add seamonkey to package.provided
> instead in the same manner.
>
>
I replaced mine a while back an
# echo "www-client/mozilla-1.7.13" >> /etc/portage/profile/package.provided
# emerge -C mozilla
# emerge seamonkey
Should do it.
If you're attached to mozilla just add seamonkey to package.provided
instead in the same manner.
--
Thomas Kear
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+64211031910
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.
I have been beating my head against some email issues for a long
time, so it's time to cry "Uncle!"
I have been able to download my POP mail via fetchmail, but every time
I download, the download limit has been about 1MB. I would like to
have a local copy of all of my mail, an archive, and I wa
Jeremy Olexa wrote:
> Tony,
> Some ebuilds filter out MAKEOPTS="-jX" because the makefile(?) is not
> written correctly to compile with more than one concurrent compile
> process. According to the OOo ebuild, -jX is not filtered, so that is
> not the case. Also, you may have checked the CPU usage w
Jacob,
You need to change the date on your computer. It's set for December 2006,
and so this thread appears before all properly-dated mail.
Brad
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anthony E. Caudel wrote:
> I have an AMD 64x2 with MAKEOPTS set to -j3.
>
> I have noticed that some compiles (glibc for example) will use the
> system to the fullest. top reports %CPU near 0%. Other compiles, such
> as openoffice seem to use only ha
I have an AMD 64x2 with MAKEOPTS set to -j3.
I have noticed that some compiles (glibc for example) will use the
system to the fullest. top reports %CPU near 0%. Other compiles, such
as openoffice seem to use only half as much cpu time. For this top
reported consistently near 50%.
So I'm wonderi
On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 22:07 +0200, Fredrik Tolf wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 23:31 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > Fredrik Tolf wrote:
> > > My main problem is that xfs (the X font server, not the filesystem) hogs
> > > the CPU for about 2-3 seconds whenever I start a new xterm, blocking the
>
I made a bad upgrade to cups ~x86, and am trying to go back.
Everything installs
fine, but no printing happens.
The error log (LogLevel=debug) says it can't convert the file (notice
the 4th and
5th from the last lines):
D [16/Jul/2006:19:23:14 -0700] AcceptClient: 6 from localhost:631.
D [16/Jul
On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 08:22:54PM -0500, Penguin Lover Jeremy Olexa squawked:
> Hi,
> Is there any other solution to the /etc/make.profile/package.provided
> file? As we all know the /usr/portage/ dir gets wiped of custom files on
> every sync. It seems kinda silly that there is a package.provided
Check out /etc/make.conf - that will override some settings. You aren't
supposed to mess with the make.profile - it's a defalt that all else is based
on.
On Sunday July 16 2006 21:22, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
> Hi,
> Is there any other solution to the /etc/make.profile/package.provided
> file? As we
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Is there any other solution to the /etc/make.profile/package.provided
file? As we all know the /usr/portage/ dir gets wiped of custom files on
every sync. It seems kinda silly that there is a package.provided
solution but it gets wiped every time,
At Sun, 16 Jul 2006 17:20:26 -0500 Michael Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've run revdep-rebuild and it says there's nothing in need of repair,
> but I can't save files in gnumeric. When I try, it gives me an error:
>
> Unable to open module file
> "/usr/lib/gnumeric/1.4.3/plugins/xml_sax
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Uwe Thiem wrote:
> On 16 July 2006 22:54, James Lockie wrote:
>> I'm trying to install without network connectivity.
>> I got to the point in the install guide where it says to emerge a kernel.
>> I can't emerge anything because I'm not on the network.
You have a pvr-150 which has onboard mpeg2 encoding. Most standard v4l
software will not play tv from such a card, because it expects a different
format from the card. For example the tvtime supported cards
list says:
"The ivtv driver supports cards that provide high quality MPEG2 encoded
video.
On 16 July 2006 22:54, James Lockie wrote:
> I'm trying to install without network connectivity.
> I got to the point in the install guide where it says to emerge a kernel.
> I can't emerge anything because I'm not on the network.
> HELP
Well, you could install from a stage 3 CD but you will never
I've run revdep-rebuild and it says there's nothing in need of repair,
but I can't save files in gnumeric. When I try, it gives me an error:
Unable to open module file
"/usr/lib/gnumeric/1.4.3/plugins/xml_sax/xml_sax",
/usr/lib/gnumeric/1.4.3/plugins/xml_sax/xml_sax.so: undefined symbol:
gsf_
On Sunday 16 July 2006 22:12, Benno Schulenberg wrote:
> Dave S wrote:
> > On Sunday 16 July 2006 21:36, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> > > "no, if you chroot, the binaries from the chroot are used.
> >
> > The problem is if I do not chroot chkrootkit will scan the
> > knoppix CD - tried it :). It
I'm trying to install without network connectivity.
I got to the point in the install guide where it says to emerge a kernel.
I can't emerge anything because I'm not on the network.
HELP
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
unsubscribe
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Sunday 16 July 2006 15:54, Dave S wrote:
> On Sunday 16 July 2006 19:54, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> > On Sunday 16 July 2006 20:25, Dave S wrote:
> > > HI, I have a potential security problem ...
> > >
> > > and err its not on gentoo, its on ubuntu but I am not getting any
> > > response the
Dave S wrote:
> On Sunday 16 July 2006 21:36, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> > "no, if you chroot, the binaries from the chroot are used.
>
> The problem is if I do not chroot chkrootkit will scan the
> knoppix CD - tried it :). It needs to access the live proc etc on
> a running system.
Use -r.
On Sun, 16 Jul 2006 15:54:18 -0400, Dave S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sunday 16 July 2006 19:54, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Sunday 16 July 2006 20:25, Dave S wrote:
> HI, I have a potential security problem ...
>
> and err its not on gentoo, its on ubuntu but I am not getting any
> resp
On Sunday 16 July 2006 21:36, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> oh, and read this:
> http://www.chkrootkit.org/faq/
Interesting ...
How accurate is chkproc?
If you run chkproc on a server that runs lots of short time processes it
could report some false positives. chkproc compares the ps output w
oh, and read this:
http://www.chkrootkit.org/faq/
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Sunday 16 July 2006 21:54, Dave S wrote:
> On Sunday 16 July 2006 19:54, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> > On Sunday 16 July 2006 20:25, Dave S wrote:
> > > HI, I have a potential security problem ...
> > >
> > > and err its not on gentoo, its on ubuntu but I am not getting any
> > > response the
On Sunday 16 July 2006 19:54, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> On Sunday 16 July 2006 20:25, Dave S wrote:
> > HI, I have a potential security problem ...
> >
> > and err its not on gentoo, its on ubuntu but I am not getting any
> > response there & you guys are the most tech bunch I know - Thought
On 7/15/06, Daniel Iliev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I had to reemerge FireFox and ThunderBird due to "emerge --depclean".
Both compiled without complains but the themes and extensions applets
are empty. I tried with recompiling gtk+-{1.2.10-r11, 2.8.19},
dev-libs/{nspr,nss}, enigmail and the mozi
On Sunday 16 July 2006 20:25, Dave S wrote:
> HI, I have a potential security problem ...
>
> and err its not on gentoo, its on ubuntu but I am not getting any response
> there & you guys are the most tech bunch I know - Thought I would lay it
> on the table :)
>
> I just had an email from chkroot
HI, I have a potential security problem ...
and err its not on gentoo, its on ubuntu but I am not getting any response
there & you guys are the most tech bunch I know - Thought I would lay it on
the table :)
I just had an email from chkrootkit last night -
---
The following suspicious files
On Sun, 2006-07-16 at 10:57 -0700, Richard Fish wrote:
> On 7/16/06, Michael Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Since the upgrade to modular X my wife has not been able to view her
> > favourite screesaver (our cats.) Whenever she runs the GLSlideshow
> > screensaver, she gets the following e
On 7/16/06, Michael Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Since the upgrade to modular X my wife has not been able to view her
favourite screesaver (our cats.) Whenever she runs the GLSlideshow
screensaver, she gets the following error:
Xlib extension GLX missing on display ":0.0"
glslideshow d
On Sunday 16 July 2006 17:36, Michael Sullivan wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-07-16 at 16:43 +0200, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> > On Sunday 16 July 2006 16:24, Michael Sullivan wrote:
> > > Since the upgrade to modular X my wife has not been able to view her
> > > favourite screesaver (our cats.) Whenev
On Sun, 2006-07-16 at 16:43 +0200, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> On Sunday 16 July 2006 16:24, Michael Sullivan wrote:
> > Since the upgrade to modular X my wife has not been able to view her
> > favourite screesaver (our cats.) Whenever she runs the GLSlideshow
> > screensaver, she gets the foll
On Sunday 16 July 2006 16:24, Michael Sullivan wrote:
> Since the upgrade to modular X my wife has not been able to view her
> favourite screesaver (our cats.) Whenever she runs the GLSlideshow
> screensaver, she gets the following error:
>
>
> Xlib extension GLX missing on display ":0.0"
>
> glsl
Since the upgrade to modular X my wife has not been able to view her
favourite screesaver (our cats.) Whenever she runs the GLSlideshow
screensaver, she gets the following error:
Xlib extension GLX missing on display ":0.0"
glslideshow display :0.0 does not support the GLX extension
I googled
Korthrun wrote:
>
> I restarted X and I can see DRI fine on a non privileged user. The
> change was adding some of the options from device section of the
> xorg.conf posted by Hemmann, Volker Armin
>
> Thanks everyone,
>
> K
>
Can you post what you changed? I would like to compare mine to yours.
Thanks Richard I did option 2 and all is working well.
> 2. Change the GROUP:= setting to be "lp". This will let cups access
> the device again. You will then need to add your user account to the
> lp group in order to scan.
>
Thanks again
Paul
--
This message has been sent using kmail with gent
On Sunday 16 July 2006 09:46, Harald Arnesen wrote:
> > Does someone know which of the dozens of cd-players for gentoo
> > is able to play copy-controlled cd's (the cd's that install a
> > player first under Windows).
> > My discman can play them, my home audioset can play them so
> > i guess there
Harald Arnesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> cdparanoia and cdrdao can rip most of these non-CDs, so you can burn
> working copy..
As these so called 'copy protected CDs' can be ripped so easily, what
advantage have the labels gained over releasing a 'standard' audio CD?
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.
Seba wrote:
> System uname: 2.6.17.4 ppc 7447A, altivec supported
> [...]
> ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="ppc ~ppc"
If you are inexperienced, you should probably not yet be using ~ppc
in your ACCEPT_KEYWORDS. :) But removing it now would just create
a lot of unneeded downgrading, so leave it for now.
>
Hans de Hartog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Does someone know which of the dozens of cd-players for gentoo
> is able to play copy-controlled cd's (the cd's that install a
> player first under Windows).
> My discman can play them, my home audioset can play them so
> i guess there must be a cdplaye
Sorry for taking so long to reply to this.
My mistake was to assume that all changes in gnome keyboard preferences
took effect immediately. That's why nothing seemed to work. I now have
the win keys as 3rd level choosers and I can type
åå to my heart's content.
45 matches
Mail list logo
