[gentoo-user] Re: Still getting calls to gcc-i486

2009-07-14 Thread Harry Putnam
Volker Armin Hemmann writes: >> That went off without error, but then going back to update world fails >> at pycairo with same error message. > > you could grep for i486-pc-linux-gnu-gcc I'm not sure what you had in mind there... or where to grep -r but a grep -r from `/' has run for several hou

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Still getting calls to gcc-i486

2009-07-14 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
On Dienstag 14 Juli 2009, Harry Putnam wrote: > Volker Armin Hemmann writes: > > > [...] > > >> i486-pc-linux-gnu-gcc: No such file or directory error: command > >> 'i486-pc-linux-gnu-gcc' failed with exit status 1 > >> [...] > > > > did you run fix-libtool.sh? > > Doing so failed to help in any w

[gentoo-user] Re: Still getting calls to gcc-i486

2009-07-14 Thread Harry Putnam
Volker Armin Hemmann writes: [...] >> i486-pc-linux-gnu-gcc: No such file or directory error: command >> 'i486-pc-linux-gnu-gcc' failed with exit status 1 >> [...] > > did you run fix-libtool.sh? Doing so failed to help in any way. root # fix_libtool_files.sh `gcc -dumpversion` --oldarch i486

Re: [gentoo-user] Still getting calls to gcc-i486

2009-07-14 Thread Heiko Wundram
On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 08:40:51 -0500, Harry Putnam wrote: > I've lost track of where all the guff was located but apparently I > missed something can anyone tell me where to look? > > emerge error: > [...] > building 'cairo._cairo' extension > creating build/temp.linux-i686-2.6 > creating buil

Re: [gentoo-user] Still getting calls to gcc-i486

2009-07-14 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
On Dienstag 14 Juli 2009, Harry Putnam wrote: > On a recent update world I get a failure on pycairo that appears to be > the result of a call for gcc-i486. > > A month or more ago I went thru the process of changing /etc/make.conf > from i486 to i686... deleting all instances of files with i486. >

[gentoo-user] Still getting calls to gcc-i486

2009-07-14 Thread Harry Putnam
On a recent update world I get a failure on pycairo that appears to be the result of a call for gcc-i486. A month or more ago I went thru the process of changing /etc/make.conf from i486 to i686... deleting all instances of files with i486. I've lost track of where all the guff was located but

Re: [gentoo-user] Suggestion for cflags for intel xeon 5500 processors

2009-07-14 Thread denis cohen
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 14:24, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 13:37:21 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: > >> > Should I use -march=core2 or nocona or native? >> > I am starting a fresh install of Gentoo on a new machine. >> > Thanks in advance. >> >> Is this a fresh unstable install? If so,

Re: [gentoo-user] Suggestion for cflags for intel xeon 5500 processors

2009-07-14 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 13:37:21 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: > > Should I use -march=core2 or nocona or native? > > I am starting a fresh install of Gentoo on a new machine. > > Thanks in advance. > > Is this a fresh unstable install? If so, your gcc will be recent and > you should use "march=nativ

Re: [gentoo-user] Suggestion for cflags for intel xeon 5500 processors

2009-07-14 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Tuesday 14 July 2009 11:37:49 denis cohen wrote: > Hi, > > Does anyone have any suggestions for CFLAGS settings in make.conf for > an Intel Xeon 5500 series processor? > Should I use -march=core2 or nocona or native? > I am starting a fresh install of Gentoo on a new machine. > Thanks in advance

[gentoo-user] Suggestion for cflags for intel xeon 5500 processors

2009-07-14 Thread denis cohen
Hi, Does anyone have any suggestions for CFLAGS settings in make.conf for an Intel Xeon 5500 series processor? Should I use -march=core2 or nocona or native? I am starting a fresh install of Gentoo on a new machine. Thanks in advance. Denis