Hello,
please, where do the file usr/lib/portage/bin/misc-functions.sh within
a HTML repository browser, so that I can compare versions?
Thank you
--
Caution crosser: Runnig Gentoo/Prefix on Cygwin/Vista.
All stupid questions are related to that context.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/10/2010 01:49 PM, walt wrote:
> On 10/10/2010 09:28 AM, Fatih Tümen wrote:
>
>> That I was fearing but I cant understand how it can fail all of a
>> sudden. I did not drop it or something. Just ran eix and boom...
>
> My favorite disk failure s
On Monday 11 October 2010 10:18:34 Al wrote:
> where do the file usr/lib/portage/bin/misc-functions.sh within a HTML
> repository browser, so that I can compare versions?
$ qfile misc-functions.sh
sys-apps/portage (/usr/lib64/portage/bin/misc-functions.sh)
I may have misunderstood you, but does
2010/10/11 Al :
>
> please, where do the file usr/lib/portage/bin/misc-functions.sh within
> a HTML repository browser, so that I can compare versions?
Here you can find all commits with changes to misc-functions.sh:
http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/portage.git;a=history;f=bin/misc-f
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 1:02 AM, Stroller
wrote:
>
> On 10 Oct 2010, at 17:21, Fatih Tümen wrote:
>> There problem is I have two more partition with about 80GB of data.
>>
>>>
>>> If you need to get data off this disk then we can advise (but search the
>>> archives for GNU dd_rescue, or just
Thank you both.
Al
--
Caution crosser: Runnig Gentoo/Prefix on Cygwin/Vista.
All stupid questions are related to that context.
On 11 Oct 2010, at 12:51, Fatih Tümen wrote:
> ...
> P.S. Would you recommend against 7200rpm usb 2.5" disks?
I'm aware of no reason to do so.
Typically usb 2.5" disks can be powered off the USB cable, which is much more
portable than the PSU required by external USB 3.5" drives.
I would guess
This is actually precisely how the artifacts appear on my screen. I
will try a downgrade and report back the results.
I wonder if there's a compiz bug out there to report this problem.
-james
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Willie Wong wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 09:29:36PM +, James wr
Has anyone here successfully installed 389 Directory Server from the
ebuilds in the portage tree?
http://bugs.gentoo.org/104554
While trying to install I run into an issue like this:
-->8--
[ebuild N] app-admin/389-console-1.1.6 111 kB
[ebuild N] www-apps/389-dsgw-1.1.5 USE="adminse
On Sunday 10 October 2010 20.08:26 walt wrote:
> On 10/10/2010 07:05 AM, Dan Johansson wrote:
> > I know this is of topic, but this is one of the few lists where you mostly
> > get a competent answer.
> >
> > I have a small problem with libvirt / qemu. I have created a guest (also
> > gentoo) on
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 16:05, Dan Johansson wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
On my system, this section looks like:
Try adding "" to yours?
Ward
Hi,
For my ASUS Crosshair IV Formula motherboard I use the (experimental)
USB 3.0 driver "xhci".
When this driver is loaded as module I cannot send the PC to
suspend-mode.
After unloading that module, it works.
Is it possible to rmmod this module and maybe sync and unmount any
related USB-device
On Monday 11 October 2010 19.02:10 Ward Poelmans wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 16:05, Dan Johansson wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> On my system, this section looks like:
>
>
>
>
>function='0x0'/>
>
>
> Try adding "" to yours?
2010/10/11 :
> Hi,
>
> For my ASUS Crosshair IV Formula motherboard I use the (experimental)
> USB 3.0 driver "xhci".
> When this driver is loaded as module I cannot send the PC to
> suspend-mode.
> After unloading that module, it works.
>
> Is it possible to rmmod this module and maybe sync and u
Uh-oh.
genlop started failing today with the mysterious error "Illegal instruction",
and it's consistent - every time. That's all the message, nothing else:
$ genlop -t portage
Illegal instruction
Now emerge dbus-glib fails similarly:
/bin/sh: line 21: 1084 Illegal instruction /usr/bin/gt
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Uh-oh.
>
> genlop started failing today with the mysterious error "Illegal instruction",
> and it's consistent - every time. That's all the message, nothing else:
>
> $ genlop -t portage
> Illegal instruction
>
> Now emerge dbus-glib fails si
Alan McKinnon schrieb am 11.10.2010 22:39:
> Uh-oh.
>
> genlop started failing today with the mysterious error "Illegal instruction",
> and it's consistent - every time. That's all the message, nothing else:
>
> $ genlop -t portage
> Illegal instruction
>
> Now emerge dbus-glib fails similarly:
Apparently, though unproven, at 23:02 on Monday 11 October 2010, Mark Knecht
did opine thusly:
> On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Alan McKinnon
wrote:
> > Uh-oh.
> >
> > genlop started failing today with the mysterious error "Illegal
> > instruction", and it's consistent - every time. That's a
Apparently, though unproven, at 23:24 on Monday 11 October 2010, Daniel
Pielmeier did opine thusly:
> Alan McKinnon schrieb am 11.10.2010 22:39:
> > Uh-oh.
> >
> > genlop started failing today with the mysterious error "Illegal
> > instruction", and it's consistent - every time. That's all the m
Alan McKinnon schrieb am 12.10.2010 00:26:
>
> It's none of those apparently. I checked CFLAGS set by the ebuild in the
> emerge log before posting and they looked fine. gcc was last updated a month
> ago and the machine gets updated almost daily.
>
> glibc seems possible but it's a moot point
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 3:21 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Apparently, though unproven, at 23:02 on Monday 11 October 2010, Mark Knecht
> did opine thusly:
>
>> On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Alan McKinnon
> wrote:
>> > Uh-oh.
>> >
>> > genlop started failing today with the mysterious error "Illeg
On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 05:30 -0400, dhk wrote:
> You know I have that installed. It looks like I tried it once, but
> didn't get far with it and then started exploring other options. Since
> I haven't found other options so I think I need to revisit this.
version 0.15 is on the way, at the least
Apparently, though unproven, at 00:40 on Tuesday 12 October 2010, Daniel
Pielmeier did opine thusly:
> Alan McKinnon schrieb am 12.10.2010 00:26:
> > It's none of those apparently. I checked CFLAGS set by the ebuild in the
> > emerge log before posting and they looked fine. gcc was last updated a
On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 00:26 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> glibc seems possible
glibc is my cause of illegal instructions atm, although I haven't tried
memtest...
> I should probably start treating this poor machine more like a notebook and
> less like a high performance machine - running flat o
Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 00:40 on Tuesday 12 October 2010, Daniel
Pielmeier did opine thusly:
:-)
This is what happens with modern reliable hardware - I should have gone for
the memory as the very very first step. It's been so long since I've had to
deal with dodgy m
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 19:28:56 +0200, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> Is it possible to rmmod this module and maybe sync and unmount any
> related USB-device automagically before entering any suspend mode?
> (Or is there any other nice trick to circumvent that problem?)
The hibernate scripts from tuxo
Apparently, though unproven, at 01:08 on Tuesday 12 October 2010, Dale did
opine thusly:
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > Apparently, though unproven, at 00:40 on Tuesday 12 October 2010, Daniel
> >
> > Pielmeier did opine thusly:
> > :-)
> >
> > This is what happens with modern reliable hardware - I
On Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 06:53:04PM +0300, Arttu V. wrote
> There it is, --disable-pango. Unfortunately by now I have already
> forgotten why I was even removing pango in the first place, so I think
> I'll re-enable it.
Pango is used for rendering non-Latin characters, e.g. Japanese and
Chinese
On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 00:38 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> AFAIK they can be used with the standard swsusp stuff, although I've only
> used it with a tuxonice-sources kernel.
yup, hibernate script works with vanilla or tuxonice, both ram and
disk :)
--
Iain Buchanan
It's no use crying over spil
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Stroller
wrote:
>
> On 11 Oct 2010, at 12:51, Fatih Tümen wrote:
>> ...
>> P.S. Would you recommend against 7200rpm usb 2.5" disks?
>
> I'm aware of no reason to do so.
>
> Typically usb 2.5" disks can be powered off the USB cable, which is much more
> portable th
2010/10/12 Alan McKinnon :
>
> To top it off, I missed the obvious three other times today, all completely
> different.
It is always the obvious things we miss. I should have thought of this
too, as just recently we had one machine failing two times within
weeks because of kaput memory. Thank
Hello,
I did a large update a week or two ago (400 packages); system is ~x86.
It took awhile and needed some cleaning, but in general everything
went smoothly.
However, I noticed that logins, su, and sudo are all responding
slowly. This was all fixed and fine once I updated my configuration
fil
32 matches
Mail list logo