Re: [gentoo-user] emerge --buildpkg --unmerge

2010-10-29 Thread Alan McKinnon
Apparently, though unproven, at 21:26 on Friday 29 October 2010, Fatih Tümen did opine thusly: > On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 21:18, Alan McKinnon wrote: > > Apparently, though unproven, at 18:46 on Friday 29 October 2010, Fatih > > Tümen > > > > did opine thusly: > >> Hi, > >> > >> Is there a way

Re: [gentoo-user] www-client/firefox-3.6.12 headers error

2010-10-29 Thread Alan McKinnon
Apparently, though unproven, at 20:45 on Friday 29 October 2010, Mick did opine thusly: > I noticed this error with the autoheader as shown below: > > * Applying xulrunner-1.9.2-gtk+-2.21.patch ... [ > ok ] * Running eautoreconf in '/var/tmp/portage/www- > client/firefox

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge --buildpkg --unmerge

2010-10-29 Thread Fatih Tümen
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 21:18, Alan McKinnon wrote: > Apparently, though unproven, at 18:46 on Friday 29 October 2010, Fatih Tümen > did opine thusly: > >> Hi, >> >> Is there a way tell portage to build binary package before removing it >> from the system? >> >> man emerge says: >> --buildpkg (-b)

[gentoo-user] www-client/firefox-3.6.12 headers error

2010-10-29 Thread Mick
I noticed this error with the autoheader as shown below: * Applying xulrunner-1.9.2-gtk+-2.21.patch ... [ ok ] * Running eautoreconf in '/var/tmp/portage/www- client/firefox-3.6.12/work/mozilla-1.9.2' ... * Running autoconf ...

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge --buildpkg --unmerge

2010-10-29 Thread Alan McKinnon
Apparently, though unproven, at 18:46 on Friday 29 October 2010, Fatih Tümen did opine thusly: > Hi, > > Is there a way tell portage to build binary package before removing it > from the system? > > man emerge says: > --buildpkg (-b) > Tells emerge to build binary packages for

[gentoo-user] emerge --buildpkg --unmerge

2010-10-29 Thread Fatih Tümen
Hi, Is there a way tell portage to build binary package before removing it from the system? man emerge says: --buildpkg (-b) Tells emerge to build binary packages for all ebuilds processed in addition to actually **merging** the packages. [...] An alte

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: scrapping hal

2010-10-29 Thread Alan McKinnon
Apparently, though unproven, at 09:58 on Friday 29 October 2010, Fatih Tümen did opine thusly: > On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 21:21, Neil Bothwick wrote: > > On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 18:11:42 +0300, Fatih Tümen wrote: > >> I agree putting -hal is not a good idea unless you dare to break the > >> packages

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: scrapping hal

2010-10-29 Thread Fatih Tümen
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 21:21, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 18:11:42 +0300, Fatih Tümen wrote: > >> I agree putting -hal is not a good idea unless you dare to break the >> packages that need hal. But I think there is a third option here > > Packages that need hal won't have a hal use