Hi,
I want to do the following as fast as possible and with less
system load as possible:
There are two directories called 'source' and 'target'.
'source' gets updated via 'svn up', then it gets compiled.
Since there is no "make install" or similiar, installation
is done via copying 'sou
On 2011-02-04, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> * Dale wrote:
>
>> You may want to check and make sure this is compiled into your kernel.
>>
>> CONFIG_SYSVIPC
>
> Are they really still using that old cruft ? ;-o
Dunno if they're using it, but the drive won't run without it. IIRC,
they use the SysV shar
Enrico Weigelt wrote:
* Dale wrote:
You may want to check and make sure this is compiled into your kernel.
CONFIG_SYSVIPC
Are they really still using that old cruft ? ;-o
cu
I don't know about its age but I do know my card would not work until I
built that in my kernel.
>> Yesterday I caught up with portage and updated quite a few packages on
>> a remote workstation. The system hadn't been updated for about a
>> month. The updates included some xorg stuff and some xfce4 stuff.
>> Today when the workstation's user logged in via gdm, she clicked the
>> xfce4 "Migr
Apparently, though unproven, at 00:26 on Saturday 05 February 2011, Grant did
opine thusly:
> Yesterday I caught up with portage and updated quite a few packages on
> a remote workstation. The system hadn't been updated for about a
> month. The updates included some xorg stuff and some xfce4 st
Yesterday I caught up with portage and updated quite a few packages on
a remote workstation. The system hadn't been updated for about a
month. The updates included some xorg stuff and some xfce4 stuff.
Today when the workstation's user logged in via gdm, she clicked the
xfce4 "Migrate Config" opt
On Fri, 4 Feb 2011 09:52:12 -0600, Paul Hartman wrote:
> > So, I think it's a timing problem as Paul has suggested in a later
> > mail. Where can I set the delay_use option of usb-storage to a higher
> > value?
>
> I think you must first ensure usb-storage is built as a module, then
> create a
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> I'm not aware of any package system that supports this.
Briegel does this. It can even build the same package (maybe with
different feature flags) in parallel. Basicly it walks the
dependency tree from leaves to root, builds binpkg's yet missing
(at the point in it r
* Dale wrote:
> If one instance of emerge doesn't know what the other instance has
> already done, then the second one could emerge it again. Doesn't emerge
> do all the calculating at the beginning and runs with that until the end?
That's also one of my questions - does parallel emerge instan
* Dale wrote:
> You may want to check and make sure this is compiled into your kernel.
>
> CONFIG_SYSVIPC
Are they really still using that old cruft ? ;-o
cu
--
--
Enrico Weigelt, metux IT service -- http://www.metux.de/
* Nils Holland wrote:
> Observation(tm): From the e2fsck man page: "e2fsck -p: Automatically
> repair ("preen") the file system. This option will cause e2fsck to
> automatically fix any filesystem problems that can be safely fixed
> without human intervention. [...] This option is normally run by
* Nils Holland wrote:
> The question is, I guess, if the target host, when of the same arch (i.e.
> i[3456]86) does actually have any influence on the code that gets
> generated in terms of performance or ability to run on other sub-arches.
> This is what I really couldn't find out so far and wou
* Nils Holland wrote:
> 1) So a package using the GNU build system determines or is passed
> (via --host aka. CHOST) a target triplet specifying the system on
> which the resulting compiled code is supposed to run. What does the
> package do with that information? Does it only use it to determine
* Alan McKinnon wrote:
> KMS removes the need for the video driver to be aware of all
> the nonsense that requires. The driver no longer needs to get
> up close and personal with everything else the kernel is doing
> and make really sure it's timing is really right. Of course,
> the video driver
Nils Holland tisys.org> writes:
> Florian Philipp wrote:
> Specifically, I've been playing around with catalyst a bit in order to
> create my own stage3 tarballs and install discs. Works fine. But then I
> started to wonder about the following: I'd probably like to make my own
> stage3 and insta
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Peter Humphrey
wrote:
> On Thursday 03 February 2011 08:14:21 Dale wrote:
>
>> I'm just glad to have something that doesn't kill my mouse and
>
>> keyboard. ;-)
>
> At the risk of hijacking the thread, this reminds me of a problem on my
> workstation. It runs Gento
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 02/04/2011 02:05 AM, walt wrote:
>>
>> On 02/03/2011 02:11 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>>>
>>> On 02/03/2011 08:07 AM, Walter Dnes wrote:
Is there a way to have a real text console? I know that I can
have 2 X sessions on
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Nils Holland wrote:
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
>> Interestingly, Ubuntu has always built for basic arches, and they seem to
>> get away with it.
>>
>> IIRC they are now on i586 but for the longest time used i386. No
>> performance issues. You might want to investigate
On Thursday 03 February 2011 08:14:21 Dale wrote:
> I'm just glad to have something that doesn't kill my mouse and
> keyboard. ;-)
At the risk of hijacking the thread, this reminds me of a problem on my
workstation. It runs Gentoo fine (well, sluggishly) but when I installed
Fedora 14 to try it
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 8:48 AM, Helmut Jarausch
wrote:
> On 02/02/2011 04:48:40 PM, Paul Hartman wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 3:43 AM, Helmut Jarausch
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > since a few weeks I have a strange effect with my USB stick.
>> >
>> > According to fdisk there is one partition
On 02/02/2011 04:48:40 PM, Paul Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 3:43 AM, Helmut Jarausch
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > since a few weeks I have a strange effect with my USB stick.
> >
> > According to fdisk there is one partition on it
> > /dev/sde1 38 7839719 3919841 b
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Interestingly, Ubuntu has always built for basic arches, and they seem to
> get away with it.
>
> IIRC they are now on i586 but for the longest time used i386. No
> performance issues. You might want to investigate how they do
> their builds and see if you can use their tric
On Fri, 04 Feb 2011 06:58:27 +0100, Florian Philipp wrote:
> Is the same true for more compatible arches like i486 -> i686? I have a
> system where I used the wrong stage-3 and now I'm stuck with an i486
> CHOST on an Atom netbook where I could use every bit of performance.
It's possible, there's
Apparently, though unproven, at 11:29 on Friday 04 February 2011, Nils Holland
did opine thusly:
> Florian Philipp wrote:
> > Am 04.02.2011 01:27, schrieb Alan McKinnon:
> >> Yes, if you are real smart it can be done. But "real smart" really does
> >> mean
> >> "real smart" i.e. not for the faint
Florian Philipp wrote:
> Am 04.02.2011 01:27, schrieb Alan McKinnon:
>>
>> Yes, if you are real smart it can be done. But "real smart" really does
>> mean
>> "real smart" i.e. not for the faint of heart and certainly not worth
>> being
>> officially supported.
>>
>
> Is the same true for more comp
Has anyone changed from the now masked www-apps/horde-webmail to the
split horde ebuilds?
I have to do that on a server where I set up horde-webmail back then ...
and I somehow hesitate ...
Is it simply "remove horde-webmail, emerge split pkgs" ?
Thanks, Stefan
26 matches
Mail list logo
