Another LVM question. If I want to remove a drive and tell pvmove to
move the data off it, can the drive have files being written to it while
this is done? I'm wanting to use my old spare drive to move some things
around but right now LVM has it. I think it is OK but just want to make
sure.
I'm just wondering, what are the benefits & drawbacks of turning on
"static" USE flag for sys-boot/grub?
Rgds,
--
FdS Pandu E Poluan
~ IT Optimizer ~
• LOPSA Member #15248
• Blog : http://pepoluan.tumblr.com
• Linked-In : http://id.linkedin.com/in/pepoluan
Am 22.11.2011 23:12, schrieb Alan Mackenzie:
> Good evening, Felix!
Good evening, Alan!
>
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 09:14:15PM +0100, Felix Kuperjans wrote:
>> Hi Alan,
>> Am 22.11.2011 20:20, schrieb Alan Mackenzie:
>>> Hi, Gentoo.
>>> A friend of mine recently suggested I should install and play
On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 22:29:23 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> What I like about VBox is that you get all the useful bits in the
> open-source version.
Except USB support.
--
Neil Bothwick
What do you get if you cross an agnostic, an insomniac and adyslexic?
Someone who lies awake at night wonder
On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 14:43 -0500, Michael Mol wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> > Hi, Gentoo.
> >
> > A friend of mine recently suggested I should install and play with
> > virtual machines on my Gentoo.
> >
> > I've scanned /usr/portage for likely looking packages
Good evening, Felix!
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 09:14:15PM +0100, Felix Kuperjans wrote:
> Hi Alan,
> Am 22.11.2011 20:20, schrieb Alan Mackenzie:
> > Hi, Gentoo.
> > A friend of mine recently suggested I should install and play with
> > virtual machines on my Gentoo.
> > I've scanned /usr/portage
On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 21:14:15 +0100
Felix Kuperjans wrote:
> > Would somebody please give me some hints which packages I should be
> > looking at, and perhaps any use flags I might need.
> VirtualBox is quite easy for beginners, but requires external kernel
> modules and requires a GUI (what you
On 11/22/2011 11:20 AM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
Hi, Gentoo.
A friend of mine recently suggested I should install and play with
virtual machines on my Gentoo.
I've scanned /usr/portage for likely looking packages, particularly in
directory "virtual", yet found nothing likely looking.
Would somebo
On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 19:20 +, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> Hi, Gentoo.
>
> A friend of mine recently suggested I should install and play with
> virtual machines on my Gentoo.
>
> I've scanned /usr/portage for likely looking packages, particularly in
> directory "virtual", yet found nothing likely
On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 14:43:10 -0500
Michael Mol wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> > Hi, Gentoo.
> >
> > A friend of mine recently suggested I should install and play with
> > virtual machines on my Gentoo.
> >
> > I've scanned /usr/portage for likely looking packag
Hi Alan,
Am 22.11.2011 20:20, schrieb Alan Mackenzie:
> Hi, Gentoo.
>
> A friend of mine recently suggested I should install and play with
> virtual machines on my Gentoo.
>
> I've scanned /usr/portage for likely looking packages, particularly in
> directory "virtual", yet found nothing likely loo
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> Hi, Gentoo.
>
> A friend of mine recently suggested I should install and play with
> virtual machines on my Gentoo.
>
> I've scanned /usr/portage for likely looking packages, particularly in
> directory "virtual", yet found nothing likely lo
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> Hi, Gentoo.
>
> A friend of mine recently suggested I should install and play with
> virtual machines on my Gentoo.
>
> I've scanned /usr/portage for likely looking packages, particularly in
> directory "virtual", yet found nothing likely l
Hi, Gentoo.
A friend of mine recently suggested I should install and play with
virtual machines on my Gentoo.
I've scanned /usr/portage for likely looking packages, particularly in
directory "virtual", yet found nothing likely looking.
Would somebody please give me some hints which packages I sh
On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 10:46:43 -0700, Justin Findlay wrote:
> I have a laptop computer with an ethernet port, and during bootup
> dhcpcd gets invoked (twice) to configure a network connection on
> 'eth0'. I have set
>
> rc_hotplug="* !net.eth0"
Try rc_hotplug="!net.eth0 *". It may be matching eth
I have a laptop computer with an ethernet port, and during bootup
dhcpcd gets invoked (twice) to configure a network connection on
'eth0'. I have set
rc_hotplug="* !net.eth0"
in /etc/rc.conf and
RC_HOTPLUG="yes"
RC_COLDPLUG="yes"
RC_PLUG_SERVICES="!net.eth0"
in /etc/conf.d/rc (why do these fil
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 8:49 AM, justin wrote:
> On 22/11/11 17:45, Mark Knecht wrote:
>> Is there a CLI way of extracting the email addresses of any
>> maintainers listed in metadata.xml?
>>
>> - Mark
>>
>
> Use epkginfo from app-portage/gentoolkit
>
> jsutin
>
>
Thanks Justin.
Cheers,
Mark
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 8:53 AM, Paul Hartman
wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Mark Knecht wrote:
>> Is there a CLI way of extracting the email addresses of any
>> maintainers listed in metadata.xml?
>
> equery m packagename | grep Maintainer
>
>
Thanks Paul. That's the sort of command
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Mark Knecht wrote:
> Is there a CLI way of extracting the email addresses of any
> maintainers listed in metadata.xml?
equery m packagename | grep Maintainer
On 22/11/11 17:45, Mark Knecht wrote:
> Is there a CLI way of extracting the email addresses of any
> maintainers listed in metadata.xml?
>
> - Mark
>
Use epkginfo from app-portage/gentoolkit
jsutin
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Is there a CLI way of extracting the email addresses of any
maintainers listed in metadata.xml?
- Mark
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 19:26, James Broadhead wrote:
> On 22 November 2011 10:45, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
>>
>> The 22/11/11, Joerg Schilling wrote:
>>
>> > You seem to miss the fact that you are using gsed instead of sed.
>> >
>> > using -r makes scripts non-portable.
>>
>> You seem to miss the
On 22 November 2011 10:45, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
> The 22/11/11, Joerg Schilling wrote:
>
> > You seem to miss the fact that you are using gsed instead of sed.
> >
> > using -r makes scripts non-portable.
>
> You seem to miss the fact that the OP didn't asked for a portable script
> and didn't
On 21 November 2011 18:51, Dale wrote:
> James Broadhead wrote:
>
>>
>> Finally: You probably don't need the MAKEOPTS flag at all - try updating
>> vim without it. ( `emerge -u vim` )
>>
>> That about covers it ;)
>>
>>
> And don't forget the -1 or --oneshot option either.
You are incorrect, vi
The 22/11/11, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> You seem to miss the fact that you are using gsed instead of sed.
>
> using -r makes scripts non-portable.
You seem to miss the fact that the OP didn't asked for a portable script
and didn't even talked about any system specification.
So, it's _welcome_ to
Pandu Poluan wrote:
> >> sed -r -e 's/-[0-9].*//'
> >
> > Nust a note: sed has no option -r and 's/(.*)-[0-9].*/\1/' is a "garbled"
> > command. A corrected version would be 's/\(.*\)-[0-9].*/\1/'
> >
> > So the main question is: why do you use a non-existing option?
> >
>
> # sed --help
>
> Usag
On 11/22/2011 10:40 AM, Joerg Schilling wrote:
>> Here's an alternative:
>>
>> sed -r -e 's/-[0-9].*//'
>
> Nust a note: sed has no option -r and 's/(.*)-[0-9].*/\1/' is a "garbled"
> command. A corrected version would be 's/\(.*\)-[0-9].*/\1/'
>
> So the main question is: why do you use a non-e
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 16:40, Joerg Schilling
wrote:
> Pandu Poluan wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 10:26, Adam Carter wrote:
>> >>> sed -r -e 's/(.*)-[0-9].*/\1/'
>> >>
>> >> You know, that looks familiar... are you trying to get a package name from
>> >> the list of eix-installed? :-)
>>
Pandu Poluan wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 10:26, Adam Carter wrote:
> >>> sed -r -e 's/(.*)-[0-9].*/\1/'
> >>
> >> You know, that looks familiar... are you trying to get a package name from
> >> the list of eix-installed? :-)
> >
> > No - its non-gentoo. In this case it hasn't worked
> >
> >
29 matches
Mail list logo
