On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 21:25:04 -0200, João Matos wrote:
> Well, It is being easy than I thought. I've compilled it and the boot
> is faster since initramfs is not needed anymore :).
Whether or not you use an initramfs shouldn't make any real difference.
However the genkernel initramfs has to do a
> Is there any tool that can scan my pc and help me out with the .conf or
> even generate one? I guess not. There are lots of options that I have no
> idea what they are for. I think this will be the fun part, but I think I
> can't get a running kernel before I optimize it, so I can do it gradually
Am 24.10.2012 13:16, schrieb Michael Hampicke:
>> Is there any tool that can scan my pc and help me out with the .conf or
>> even generate one? I guess not. There are lots of options that I have no
>> idea what they are for. I think this will be the fun part, but I think I
>> can't get a running ke
Well, thank you for your help.
I had some problems, like no bootable system or no network, but I could
solve it and things are working pretty well pretty.
The compilation time is really small after I removed these modules, but I
think it should be smaller: apparently the 'make && make modules ins
Kernels 3.4, 3.5, and 3.6 can result in severe data corruption if you're
using the EXT4 filesystem:
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTIxNDQ
This includes gentoo-sources. I hope the Gentoo developers are on top
of this. In the meantime, avoid doing reboots after too short a
João Matos wrote:
> Well, thank you for your help.
>
> I had some problems, like no bootable system or no network, but I
> could solve it and things are working pretty well pretty.
>
> The compilation time is really small after I removed these modules,
> but I think it should be smaller: apparently
On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 11:47:55 -0200, João Matos wrote:
> The size is almost the same (3.3 MB), and I believe this is why my work
> until now was to remove non used hardware modules - the easy part.
Modules don't significantly affect the size of the kernel, only builtins.
A hand-prepared kernel may
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> Kernels 3.4, 3.5, and 3.6 can result in severe data corruption if
> you're using the EXT4 filesystem:
>
> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTIxNDQ
>
> This includes gentoo-sources. I hope the Gentoo developers are on top
> of this. In the meantime, avo
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> Kernels 3.4, 3.5, and 3.6 can result in severe data corruption if you're
> using the EXT4 filesystem:
>
> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTIxNDQ
>
> This includes gentoo-sources. I hope the Gentoo developers are on to
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> Kernels 3.4, 3.5, and 3.6 can result in severe data corruption if you're
> using the EXT4 filesystem:
>
> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTIxNDQ
>
> This includes gentoo-sources. I hope the Gentoo developers are on to
Dale wrote:
> Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> > Kernels 3.4, 3.5, and 3.6 can result in severe data corruption if
> > you're using the EXT4 filesystem:
> >
> > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTIxNDQ
> >
> > This includes gentoo-sources. I hope the Gentoo developers are on top
> >
When try to access:
http://packages.gentoo.org/
I get:
Empty Page!
If you expected a real website instead something must be wrong. :-(
Where did it go?
--
Joseph
Am Wed, 24 Oct 2012 10:01:17 -0600
schrieb Joseph :
> When try to access:
> http://packages.gentoo.org/
>
> I get:
> Empty Page!
> If you expected a real website instead something must be wrong. :-(
>
> Where did it go?
I'd like to know, too. For the past few days the site simply timed out on
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Joseph wrote:
> When try to access:
> http://packages.gentoo.org/
>
> I get:
> Empty Page!
> If you expected a real website instead something must be wrong. :-(
> Where did it go?
IIRC there was a server crash about a week ago, affecting many gentoo
websites, PGO
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 04:54:39PM +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> Kernels 3.4, 3.5, and 3.6 can result in severe data corruption if you're
> using the EXT4 filesystem:
>
> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTIxNDQ
>
> This includes gentoo-sources. I hope the Gentoo developer
Anyone else getting "no carrier" when trying to set up a network bridge
with TUN/TAP? I use that for KVM, and it doesn't work since last reboot.
I saw the issue mentioned on forums.gentoo.org, no solution.
Downgrading openrc didn't help as well.
Any help available?
Thanks, Stefan
Hello,
this is not exactly an Gentoo question - but i don't now where to ask
otherwise.
Is there a tool for (Gentoo-)Linux to do network performance tests as defined
in RFC 2544 ?
This will run on an Gentoo host having at least 2 network interfaces to be
connected to the device under test.
re
Am 2012-10-24 20:34, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
>
> Anyone else getting "no carrier" when trying to set up a network bridge
> with TUN/TAP? I use that for KVM, and it doesn't work since last reboot.
>
> I saw the issue mentioned on forums.gentoo.org, no solution.
>
> Downgrading openrc didn't
greetings ...
the server in my basement is driving me nuts ... and I start making
mistakes ... sigh
It had a LVM volume group ... consisting of two PVs ...
The question in short:
if I only have one PV at hand, which contains all the PEs of a given LV
... (how) am I able to extract/export/read
Am 24.10.2012 22:08, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
>
> greetings ...
>
> the server in my basement is driving me nuts ... and I start making
> mistakes ... sigh
>
> It had a LVM volume group ... consisting of two PVs ...
>
> The question in short:
>
> if I only have one PV at hand, which conta
Am 24.10.2012 22:23, schrieb Florian Philipp:
> First things first: If you can, make a disk dump of every affected
> HDD or at least back up the metadata with vgcfgbackup.
>
> Have you tried activating the volume group with --partial (see
> `man lvm`). Something along the lines of `lvchange --par
On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 13:10:24 -0500
Bruce Hill wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 04:54:39PM +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> > Kernels 3.4, 3.5, and 3.6 can result in severe data corruption if
> > you're using the EXT4 filesystem:
> >
> > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTIxNDQ
affected kernel versions are masked now!
On 10/25/2012 12:36 AM, john wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 13:10:24 -0500
> Bruce Hill wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 04:54:39PM +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>>> Kernels 3.4, 3.5, and 3.6 can result in severe data corruption if
>>> you're using the
yeah, saw this problem on my openvpn server today. i made upgrades a few
days ago.
i removed symlink to net.tap0 and removed tap0 from br0. now server is
booting correctly, but openvpn is not working...
no time to investigate further now. maybe in a few days.
On 10/24/2012 08:34 PM, Stefan G. We
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> Kernels 3.4, 3.5, and 3.6 can result in severe data corruption if you're
> using the EXT4 filesystem:
>
> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTIxNDQ
>
> This includes gentoo-sources. I hope the Gentoo developers are on to
Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Kernels 3.4, 3.5, and 3.6 can result in severe data corruption if you're
using the EXT4 filesystem:
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTIxNDQ
This includes gentoo-sources. I hope the Gentoo
On 10/23/2012 10:02 PM, João Matos wrote:
Hi list.
Just for curiosity, what is the size of your kernel? Mine is 3.4 MB.
Thank you,
--
João de Matos
Linux User #461527
2.7 MB ,initramfs 1.5 MB
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 8:09 PM, Kerin Millar wrote:
> Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Nikos Chantziaras
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Kernels 3.4, 3.5, and 3.6 can result in severe data corruption if you're
>>> using the EXT4 filesystem:
>>>
>>> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 8:09 PM, Kerin Millar wrote:
> Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Nikos Chantziaras
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Kernels 3.4, 3.5, and 3.6 can result in severe data corruption if you're
>>> using the EXT4 filesystem:
>>>
>>> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.
Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 8:09 PM, Kerin Millar wrote:
Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Nikos Chantziaras
wrote:
Kernels 3.4, 3.5, and 3.6 can result in severe data corruption if you're
using the EXT4 filesystem:
http://www.phoronix.com/sca
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 10:51 PM, Kerin Millar wrote:
> Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 8:09 PM, Kerin
>> Millar>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
>>>
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Nikos Chantziaras
wrote:
> Kernels 3.4, 3.5, and 3.6 can r
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Kerin Millar wrote:
[snip]
> On my part, I will continue to be concerned until the investigation has fully
> run its course.
That is, of course, your prerogative. I just posted a comment from
someone that (IMHO) actually knows what he's talking about. What
anyone
On 25/10/12 06:04, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Kerin Millar wrote:
[snip]
On my part, I will continue to be concerned until the investigation has fully
run its course.
That is, of course, your prerogative. I just posted a comment from
someone that (IMHO) actua
33 matches
Mail list logo
