On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 4:16 AM, Mick wrote:
> On Friday 30 Aug 2013 15:44:35 Tanstaafl wrote:
>> On 2013-08-30 10:34 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> > On 30/08/2013 16:29, Tanstaafl wrote:
>> >> Why would there be a problem if someone decided to create a 3rd party
>> >> overlay *not* part of the off
On Fri, 30 Aug 2013 21:46:37 -0400
"Walter Dnes" wrote:
> Whenever I hibernate or do a wake-up from hibernation, I always get
> messages about a crond time disparity detected. It's usually 580 or
> 602 minutes. But the clock appears to be correct within a few
> seconds after wake-up. I'm in
Whenever I hibernate or do a wake-up from hibernation, I always get
messages about a crond time disparity detected. It's usually 580 or 602
minutes. But the clock appears to be correct within a few seconds after
wake-up. I'm in Eastern time, running local time...
[i660][waltdnes][~] cat /etc/
On Fri, 23 Aug 2013 23:12:39 -0500
»Q« wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Aug 2013 00:15:40 +0200
> Paul Klos wrote:
>
> > Op vrijdag 23 augustus 2013 14:09:59 schreef Randy Westlund:
> > > On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 10:45:46AM -0700, Chris Stankevitz
> > > wrote:
> > > > Are "regular" nvidia users who run a c
On 08/30/2013 04:05 PM, walt wrote:
> On 08/27/2013 12:59 AM, Joerg Schilling wrote:
>
>> The GPL is in conflict with the law
>
> Joerg, which law are you talking about?
Oops, I see you've already answered my question. Please ignore.
On 08/27/2013 12:59 AM, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> The GPL is in conflict with the law
Joerg, which law are you talking about? I've never understood the problems
surrounding the many and various available software licenses, and I don't
think I ever will understand them. But I'm still trying :)
On Friday 30 Aug 2013 15:44:35 Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 2013-08-30 10:34 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > On 30/08/2013 16:29, Tanstaafl wrote:
> >> Why would there be a problem if someone decided to create a 3rd party
> >> overlay *not* part of the official gentoo portage tree that contained
> >> *only*
On 30/08/2013 16:44, Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 2013-08-30 10:34 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> On 30/08/2013 16:29, Tanstaafl wrote:
>>> Why would there be a problem if someone decided to create a 3rd party
>>> overlay *not* part of the official gentoo portage tree that contained
>>> *only* the zfs stuff
On 30/08/2013 17:18, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 30 2013, J. Roeleveld wrote:
>
>> gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
>>> I want to reinstall an old system to have combined root+usr.
>>>
>>> I have always used an lvm installation guide that was a "companion" to
>>> the handbook. That is it would t
gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
>On Fri, Aug 30 2013, J. Roeleveld wrote:
>
>> gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
>>>I want to reinstall an old system to have combined root+usr.
>>>
>>>I have always used an lvm installation guide that was a "companion"
>to
>>>the handbook. That is it would tell you how to augment ea
On 29/08/2013 08:54, Pandu Poluan wrote:
Hello list!
Here's my scenario:
Currently there is a server performing 2 functions; one runs on, let's
say, port 2000, and another one runs on port 3000.
Due to some necessary changes, especially the need to (1) provide more
resource for a function, and
On 2013-08-30 10:34 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 30/08/2013 16:29, Tanstaafl wrote:
Why would there be a problem if someone decided to create a 3rd party
overlay *not* part of the official gentoo portage tree that contained
*only* the zfs stuff, and when this overlay was installed combined with
On 30/08/2013 16:37, Tanstaafl wrote:
>> And for a good reason: is braindead.
>
> Again - it is only braindead if you accept the basic premise that it
> 'makes sense' to put files critical to the boot process into /usr.
>
> Personally, I think it only 'makes sense' to put files critical to the
>
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 2013-08-30 10:28 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
>>
>> udev/eudev has nothing to do with it. It's the init systems (as in
>> both systemd and OpenRC) the ones that are pushing/have pushed for
>> dropping support for it. In Gentoo, the move is
On Fri, Aug 30 2013, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
>>I want to reinstall an old system to have combined root+usr.
>>
>>I have always used an lvm installation guide that was a "companion" to
>>the handbook. That is it would tell you how to augment each handbook
>>installation chapt
On 2013-08-30 10:38 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 30/08/2013 16:37, Tanstaafl wrote:
Personally, I think it only 'makes sense' to put files critical to the
boot process into /boot.
It's not the boot process. It's the startup-to-early-init process.
Or put another way, the entire start process
On 30/08/2013 16:29, Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 2013-08-28 7:12 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> Whether the code is compile in or a module makes no difference wrt
>> licenses as far as I know.
>>
>> There's no limitation on*running* the code, you can fetch and patch and
>> edit and compile and run all you
On 2013-08-30 10:28 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
udev/eudev has nothing to do with it. It's the init systems (as in
both systemd and OpenRC) the ones that are pushing/have pushed for
dropping support for it. In Gentoo, the move is being championed by
William Hubs:
http://thread.gmane.org/gman
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 9:05 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 2013-08-30 3:16 AM, Dale wrote:
>>
>> Example, don't want a init thingy, put / on a regular partition and
>> normal file system, just make sure you won't fill it up for a very
>> long time. Of course /boot has to be on a regular file system t
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 07:33:03PM +0400, the wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 08/25/13 17:51, Michael Mair-Keimberger wrote:
> > Hi List,
> >
> >
> >
> > Since a few days i'm trying to install gentoo on a kvm guest from
> > edis.at. They support to boot from a g
On 2013-08-28 7:12 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Whether the code is compile in or a module makes no difference wrt
licenses as far as I know.
There's no limitation on*running* the code, you can fetch and patch and
edit and compile and run all you want and have it on as many of your (or
the company
On Thursday 29 Aug 2013 09:18:31 Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have an old HP 625 laptop with an ATI RS880 HDMI Audio [Radeon HD
> 4200 Series]
> chip on board.
>
> The xf86-video-ati driver needs DRM (direct rendering support) in the
> kernel.
> Unfortunately, if (and only if) I enable DRM
On 2013-08-30 3:16 AM, Dale wrote:
Example, don't want a init thingy, put / on a regular partition and
normal file system, just make sure you won't fill it up for a very
long time. Of course /boot has to be on a regular file system too.
Well, apparently this now includes /usr, as from what I g
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 1:10 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 30/08/2013 07:36, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:21 AM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
>>> gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
On Thu, Aug 29 2013, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 4:19 PM, wrote:
>>>
On 2013-08-28 7:24 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 07:04:39 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
So... is 2.2 *ever* going to go stable???
Give it a chance! It's only just come out of rc. Until recently it
wasn't even available in testing without umasking.
Ok, sorry, I totally missed the s
2013/8/29 Francisco Ares
>
> 2013/8/29 Gregory Shearman
>
>> In linux.gentoo.user, you wrote:
>> >>
>> >> search for CONSOLE in this file and find:
>> >>
>> >> # exec >${CONSOLE} <${CONSOLE} 2>&1
>> >>
>> >> Just remove the hash at the start of the line, rebuild my initramfs
>> >> and it is
On 30/08/2013 11:14, 东方巽雷 wrote:
> What does the title mean?I always seem it when running emerge,but the
> file /usr/local/portage/metadata/layout.conf does not exist.
That's the entire problem, the file does not exist so the required
information in it cannot be there.
The masters attribute is r
What does the title mean?I always seem it when running emerge,but the
file /usr/local/portage/metadata/layout.conf does not exist.
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 30/08/2013 03:45, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 29 2013, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 4:19 PM, wrote:
I have experience with LVM, but not systemd or dracut or initramfs
* both grub and grub2 support lvm
>>> Does GRUB l
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 30/08/2013 07:36, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:21 AM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
>>> No. Grub legacy does not support LVM for the /boot. That's why I
>>> have it there. UEFI only understands FAT. Which means you need to
>>> have a boot partition outsi
30 matches
Mail list logo
