Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Kernel ricing

2013-10-24 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 24/10/2013 19:36, Tanstaafl wrote: > On 2013-10-24 1:03 PM, Bruce Hill wrote: >> I'm not positive of it's architecture, but for 20 months I had a Samsung >> Galaxy S running Android. This was by far the biggest POS I ever >> owned. From >> the first week it spontaneously rebooted, hung, and the

Re: [gentoo-user] Kernel ricing thread take 2

2013-10-24 Thread Greg Turner
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Adam Carter wrote: > > To build with other flags you set CFLAGS_KERNEL, so i've added a suitable > -march to the standard ones for my system; > export CFLAGS_KERNEL=" -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 > -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -march=amdfam10" >

[gentoo-user] Kernel ricing thread take 2

2013-10-24 Thread Adam Carter
Ok, the other thread really took off down some odd, and to my eyes way off topic, directions. Anyway, the idea was to ask for feedback on who has done it and the results they got. To keep things focussed, lets leave out any talk of ARM, cross compiling, small/embedded systems, iphones, Apple, Andr

[gentoo-user] Ebuild

2013-10-24 Thread Silvio Siefke
Hello, i has make a ebuild, but i not so sure what must do for build Process. Its a screen keyboard i like it, thats why i make the ebuild. The name is onboard, i use since i use linux :) and know it from launchpad.net. http://silviosiefke.com/downloads/onboard.tar.gz But what i must do. The

Re: [gentoo-user] Kernel ricing

2013-10-24 Thread Walter Dnes
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 09:58:17PM +1100, Adam Carter wrote > I figured that just -march=amdfam10 was a good start, since it implies > MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A, 3DNow!, enhanced 3DNow! and ABM, but i > may add the rest of my make.conf CFLAGs since I dont have any issues > with any other softwar

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [O/T] RAID help - now won't boot

2013-10-24 Thread Mick
On Tuesday 22 Oct 2013 08:10:18 Nicolas Sebrecht wrote: > The 21/10/13, Mick wrote: > > I'm fast gravitating towards this option ... > > > > Although with metadata 0.90 I was able to progress with the installation > > (after I deselected the swap partitions) the grub-install script wanted > > to i

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Kernel ricing

2013-10-24 Thread Tanstaafl
On 2013-10-24 1:51 PM, Bruce Hill wrote: On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 01:36:37PM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote: Just because you got a phone that was bad, and didn't bother to get it replaced, doesn't make all Galaxy S4 phones as bad as yours. Hey, dipstick! Apparently you can't distinguish between S an

[gentoo-user] Re: Kernel ricing

2013-10-24 Thread James
Tanstaafl libertytrek.org> writes: > > On 2013-10-24 1:03 PM, Bruce Hill happypenguincomputers.com> wrote: > > I'm not positive of it's architecture, but for 20 months I had a Samsung > > Galaxy S running Android. This was by far the biggest POS I ever owned. From > > the first week it spontane

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Kernel ricing

2013-10-24 Thread Bruce Hill
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 01:36:37PM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote: > > Just because you got a phone that was bad, and didn't bother to get it > replaced, doesn't make all Galaxy S4 phones as bad as yours. Hey, dipstick! Apparently you can't distinguish between S and S4. :-) -- Happy Penguin Computers

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Kernel ricing

2013-10-24 Thread Bruce Hill
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 05:31:08PM +, James wrote: > > > > I'm not positive of it's architecture, but for 20 months I had a Samsung > > Galaxy S running Android. This was by far the biggest POS I ever owned. > >From > > th

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Kernel ricing

2013-10-24 Thread Tanstaafl
On 2013-10-24 1:03 PM, Bruce Hill wrote: I'm not positive of it's architecture, but for 20 months I had a Samsung Galaxy S running Android. This was by far the biggest POS I ever owned. From the first week it spontaneously rebooted, hung, and the performance was horrible when it did run. I've s

[gentoo-user] Re: Kernel ricing

2013-10-24 Thread James
Bruce Hill happypenguincomputers.com> writes: > > specifically for tight target implementations. Samsung is killing > > the world, with ARM and open source linux. > > James > > I'm not positive of it's architecture, but for 20 months I had a Samsung

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Kernel ricing

2013-10-24 Thread Bruce Hill
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 03:26:05PM +, James wrote: > > specifically for tight target implementations. Samsung is killing > the world, with ARM and open source linux. > > James I'm not positive of it's architecture, but for 20 months I had a Samsung

[gentoo-user] Re: Kernel ricing

2013-10-24 Thread James
Adam Carter gmail.com> writes: > Some background: Wow!. Ok. Let me point out the obvious, that there are 2 basic ways to build a kernel: Natively on the local resources (CPU, ram etc) of the target system, and Cross Compiling. CrossCompiling is often much faster and even preferred, ymmv. Also

[gentoo-user] Re: Kernel ricing

2013-10-24 Thread James
Alan McKinnon gmail.com> writes: > I bet I'm an older fart than you are! nya-nya-nya-naa! tune of a teasing 6 year old) With all due respect, I was an " old-fart" in my youth. I use to love sitting around campfires with old hunter (gathers?) and shoot the shi about life. Beside my tant

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Kernel ricing

2013-10-24 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 24/10/2013 17:26, James wrote: > Alan McKinnon gmail.com> writes: > > >> I now officially need new spectacles. I read -march=amdfam10 and my >> eyeballs told my brain it was "arm" >> > > As an old fart, to a fledgling old-fart; Now we can have a willy-waving contest! I bet I'm an older f

[gentoo-user] Re: Kernel ricing

2013-10-24 Thread James
Alan McKinnon gmail.com> writes: > I now officially need new spectacles. I read -march=amdfam10 and my > eyeballs told my brain it was "arm" > As an old fart, to a fledgling old-fart; its because ARM is taking over the world, that your brain performed this superposition transformation. Your gl

Re: [gentoo-user] Kernel ricing

2013-10-24 Thread the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/24/13 12:58, Adam Carter wrote: > The CFLAGs used when building the kernel are set in the Makefile; # > grep HOSTCFLAGS /usr/src/linux/Makefile HOSTCFLAGS = -Wall > -Wmissing-prototypes -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer > > To build

Re: [gentoo-user] Kernel ricing

2013-10-24 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 24/10/2013 12:58, Adam Carter wrote: > I see all you've done is specify -march; what does the build system > build for without that setting? > > > Does your question imply that more may happen to the CFLAGs than them > just being passed to gcc? I have no idea, so just assumed gcc does

Re: [gentoo-user] Kernel ricing

2013-10-24 Thread Adam Carter
> > I see all you've done is specify -march; what does the build system > build for without that setting? > > Does your question imply that more may happen to the CFLAGs than them just being passed to gcc? I have no idea, so just assumed gcc does whatever it does when no -march is supplied, which i

Re: [gentoo-user] Kernel ricing

2013-10-24 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 24/10/2013 10:58, Adam Carter wrote: > The CFLAGs used when building the kernel are set in the Makefile; > # grep HOSTCFLAGS /usr/src/linux/Makefile > HOSTCFLAGS = -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 > -fomit-frame-pointer > > To build with other flags you set CFLAGS_KERNEL, so

[gentoo-user] Kernel ricing

2013-10-24 Thread Adam Carter
The CFLAGs used when building the kernel are set in the Makefile; # grep HOSTCFLAGS /usr/src/linux/Makefile HOSTCFLAGS = -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer To build with other flags you set CFLAGS_KERNEL, so i've added a suitable -march to the standard ones f