Re: [gentoo-user] Re: emerge failed for sys-devel/binutils-2.23.2

2014-01-11 Thread Tom Wijsman
On Sat, 11 Jan 2014 19:41:10 -0500 Andrew Penhorwood wrote: > I will try the -j1. This is a VM that is initially setup my > Linode.com. Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) don't work on Linode, which is what might cause the assembler instruction subtract to fail, as you can see in my other mail; y

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: emerge failed for sys-devel/binutils-2.23.2

2014-01-11 Thread Tom Wijsman
On Sat, 11 Jan 2014 15:19:23 -0800 walt wrote: > On 01/11/2014 02:32 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote: > > On Sat, 11 Jan 2014 17:16:36 -0500 > > Andrew Penhorwood wrote: > > > >> * ERROR: sys-devel/binutils-2.23.2::gentoo failed (compile > >> phase): > >> * emake failed > >> * > >> * Call stack

Re: [gentoo-user] Purged gnome, lost X. :-(

2014-01-11 Thread Tom Wijsman
On Sat, 11 Jan 2014 17:02:17 + Alan Mackenzie wrote: > xfce4-session: GNOME compatibility is enabled and > gnome-keyring-daemon is found on the system. Skipping gpg/ssh-agent > startup. env: kdeinit4: No such file or directory So, eh, a mixture of XFCE, GNOME and KDE; what's going on her

Re: [gentoo-user] glibc update 2.16 > 2.17 - python relocation error at end of emerge

2014-01-11 Thread Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/08/2014 01:03 PM, Tanstaafl wrote: > Could this have anything to do with the fact that I don't have either of > these set in /etc/portage/make.comf: > > PYTHON_TARGETS="python2_7 python3_3" > PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET="python2_7" > You really do not

[gentoo-user] Re: eix-sync data comparison

2014-01-11 Thread eroen
On Sat, 11 Jan 2014 21:44:19 +0100, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: > > On 11/01/2014 22:04, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: > > > suppose I would do an eix-sync on two different computers of > > > different platforms -- say AMR and an ordinary PC. Sharing a portage tree (the files in /usr/portage) is perfe

Re: [gentoo-user] mutt - view pdf files

2014-01-11 Thread Joseph
On 01/11/14 20:23, Walter Dnes wrote: On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 12:08:15PM -0700, Joseph wrote I'm using mutt and trying to view pdf files using evince but it is not working. I have added to /etc/mailcap application/pdf; evince %s; description="Postscript files"; test=test -n "$DISPLAY" -a -n "`

Re: [gentoo-user] mutt - view pdf files

2014-01-11 Thread Walter Dnes
On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 12:08:15PM -0700, Joseph wrote > I'm using mutt and trying to view pdf files using evince but it is > not working. > > I have added to /etc/mailcap application/pdf; evince %s; > description="Postscript files"; test=test -n "$DISPLAY" -a -n "`which evince > 2>/dev/null`" >

Re: [gentoo-user] eix-sync data comparison

2014-01-11 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Saturday 11 Jan 2014 23:14:59 Alan McKinnon wrote: > If you want to reduce the data downloaded, then by all means configure > rsyncd to share the tree on the PC, and point the ARM to that. Don't > worry about overlays, the amount of changed data from them is usually > too small to worry about.

Re: [gentoo-user] Purged gnome, lost X. :-(

2014-01-11 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Saturday 11 Jan 2014 22:02:11 Alan McKinnon wrote: > We should keep in mind that you are doing a rather substantial > migration, gnome-3 is in the works and you want to get rid of it. Best > approach is to really get rid of it, not just tell portage to not use it > anymore. ...and that means s

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: emerge failed for sys-devel/binutils-2.23.2

2014-01-11 Thread Andrew Penhorwood
I will try the -j1. This is a VM that is initially setup my Linode.com. Andrew On 1/11/2014 6:19 PM, walt wrote: On 01/11/2014 02:32 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote: On Sat, 11 Jan 2014 17:16:36 -0500 Andrew Penhorwood wrote: * ERROR: sys-devel/binutils-2.23.2::gentoo failed (compile phase): *

Re: [gentoo-user] Purged gnome, lost X. :-(

2014-01-11 Thread William Kenworthy
On 12/01/14 05:51, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Sat, 11 Jan 2014 22:02:11 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: > >> I recommend you do these steps in this order >> >> 1. emerge -at --depclean >> Inspect the list carefully, 289 packages is a lot. Take your time; >> quickpkg anything you aren't sure of. When yo

[gentoo-user] Re: MATE is great!

2014-01-11 Thread walt
On 01/10/2014 04:18 PM, walt wrote: > The only reason I didn't switch to xfce a long time > ago is that I want the old familiar 'multiload' panel applet, which AFAIK > is not available for xfce. At least it wasn't the last time I checked. > > Well, I just checked again and found this interesting:

[gentoo-user] Re: emerge failed for sys-devel/binutils-2.23.2

2014-01-11 Thread walt
On 01/11/2014 02:32 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote: > On Sat, 11 Jan 2014 17:16:36 -0500 > Andrew Penhorwood wrote: > >> * ERROR: sys-devel/binutils-2.23.2::gentoo failed (compile phase): >> * emake failed >> * >> * Call stack: >> * ebuild.sh, line 93: Called src_compile >> * enviro

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge failed for sys-devel/binutils-2.23.2

2014-01-11 Thread Tom Wijsman
On Sat, 11 Jan 2014 17:16:36 -0500 Andrew Penhorwood wrote: > * ERROR: sys-devel/binutils-2.23.2::gentoo failed (compile phase): > * emake failed > * > * Call stack: > * ebuild.sh, line 93: Called src_compile > * environment, line 2823: Called toolchain-binutils_src_compil

[gentoo-user] emerge failed for sys-devel/binutils-2.23.2

2014-01-11 Thread Andrew Penhorwood
I tried to update my gentoo VM on Linode.com today. I used "emerge --update --deep --with-bdeps=y @world" and sys-devel/binutils-2.23.2 was one of the items reported by portage. Portage stated that the compile failed. Here are the last few lines of the build.log. Any help would be appreciate

Re: [gentoo-user] Purged gnome, lost X. :-(

2014-01-11 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Sat, 11 Jan 2014 22:02:11 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: > I recommend you do these steps in this order > > 1. emerge -at --depclean > Inspect the list carefully, 289 packages is a lot. Take your time; > quickpkg anything you aren't sure of. When you are happy the list only > contains stuff you w

Re: [gentoo-user] eix-sync data comparison

2014-01-11 Thread meino . cramer
Alan McKinnon [14-01-11 22:16]: > On 11/01/2014 22:44, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: > > Alan McKinnon [14-01-11 21:16]: > >> On 11/01/2014 22:04, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> suppose I would do an eix-sync on two different computers of different > >>> platforms -- say AMR and an

Re: [gentoo-user] eix-sync data comparison

2014-01-11 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 11/01/2014 22:44, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: > Alan McKinnon [14-01-11 21:16]: >> On 11/01/2014 22:04, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> suppose I would do an eix-sync on two different computers of different >>> platforms -- say AMR and an ordinary PC. >>> >>> Are the downloaded data i

Re: [gentoo-user] eix-sync data comparison

2014-01-11 Thread meino . cramer
Alan McKinnon [14-01-11 21:16]: > On 11/01/2014 22:04, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: > > Hi, > > > > suppose I would do an eix-sync on two different computers of different > > platforms -- say AMR and an ordinary PC. > > > > Are the downloaded data identical? > > the portage tree is identical ever

Re: [gentoo-user] eix-sync data comparison

2014-01-11 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 11/01/2014 22:04, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: > Hi, > > suppose I would do an eix-sync on two different computers of different > platforms -- say AMR and an ordinary PC. > > Are the downloaded data identical? the portage tree is identical everywhere the overlays that layman uses are identical

[gentoo-user] eix-sync data comparison

2014-01-11 Thread meino . cramer
Hi, suppose I would do an eix-sync on two different computers of different platforms -- say AMR and an ordinary PC. Are the downloaded data identical? And -- if so -- is it possible to first eix-sync the PC and the eix-sync the ARM against the PC instead an official Gentoo-server? Best regards

Re: [gentoo-user] Purged gnome, lost X. :-(

2014-01-11 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 11/01/2014 21:31, Alan Mackenzie wrote: > Hello, Alan. > > On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 07:16:20PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: >> On 11/01/2014 19:02, Alan Mackenzie wrote: >>> Hi, Gentoo. > >>> I finally got round to emerging my post-gnome system, triggered by the >>> stabilisation of gnome-3, and

Re: [gentoo-user] Purged gnome, lost X. :-(

2014-01-11 Thread Alan Mackenzie
Hello, Alan. On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 07:16:20PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 11/01/2014 19:02, Alan Mackenzie wrote: > > Hi, Gentoo. > > I finally got round to emerging my post-gnome system, triggered by the > > stabilisation of gnome-3, and the consequent shift to systemd, and what > > not.

[gentoo-user] mutt - view pdf files

2014-01-11 Thread Joseph
I'm using mutt and trying to view pdf files using evince but it is not working. I have added to /etc/mailcap application/pdf; evince %s; description="Postscript files"; test=test -n "$DISPLAY" -a -n "`which evince 2>/dev/null`" but it makes no difference. What am I doing wrong :-/ -- Joseph

Re: [gentoo-user] Purged gnome, lost X. :-(

2014-01-11 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 11/01/2014 19:02, Alan Mackenzie wrote: > Hi, Gentoo. > > I finally got round to emerging my post-gnome system, triggered by the > stabilisation of gnome-3, and the consequent shift to systemd, and what > not. I last synched my /usr/portage 34 days ago. I had been putting > this change off, i

[gentoo-user] Purged gnome, lost X. :-(

2014-01-11 Thread Alan Mackenzie
Hi, Gentoo. I finally got round to emerging my post-gnome system, triggered by the stabilisation of gnome-3, and the consequent shift to systemd, and what not. I last synched my /usr/portage 34 days ago. I had been putting this change off, it turns out, with good reason. Now when I attempt to s

Re: [gentoo-user] NAT problem

2014-01-11 Thread Mick
On Saturday 11 Jan 2014 09:03:16 the wrote: > Also > "Besides MTU, there is yet another way to set the maximum packet size, > the so called Maximum Segment Size. This is a field in the TCP Options > part of a SYN packet." > > Does this mean that even with this iptables rule I'll have problems > w

Re: [gentoo-user] NAT problem

2014-01-11 Thread Mick
On Saturday 11 Jan 2014 08:49:15 the wrote: > On 01/11/14 03:24, Mick wrote: > > Is there a router somewhere (your ISP?) that does not play nice > > with PMTU Discovery? What happens if you set your ifaces to have > > an mtu of 1492 (needed to accomodate your PPPoE headers) or even > > lower like

Re: [gentoo-user] NAT problem

2014-01-11 Thread the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/11/14 12:49, the wrote: > On 01/11/14 03:24, Mick wrote: >> On Friday 10 Jan 2014 19:42:37 Kerin Millar wrote: >>> the wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello. This is the the first time I'm dealing with wifi an

[gentoo-user] Anjuta fail to debug application.

2014-01-11 Thread Cor Legemaat
Hi: When I try to debug an application in Anjuta 3.8.4 on my Gentoo Hardened pc I get an error of "Unable to find a debugger plugin supporting a target with application/x-sharedlib MIME type", got that with 3.2, 3.4 and 3.6 also but didn't had time to investigate. I installed an virtual machine w

Re: [gentoo-user] NAT problem

2014-01-11 Thread the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/11/14 03:24, Mick wrote: > On Friday 10 Jan 2014 19:42:37 Kerin Millar wrote: >> the wrote: >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >>> >>> Hello. This is the the first time I'm dealing with wifi and the >>> second time with NAT. I hav