151225 walt wrote:
> You can work around the failure by installing 5.3.0
> with the -jit useflag (which should succeed) and *then* switch to 5.3.0
> using gcc-config before re-installing 5.3.0 with +jit.
So this is one of the 50 % cases where USE="-* ... " helps (smile).
--
=
Hello,
On Fri, 25 Dec 2015, walt wrote:
>On Thu, 24 Dec 2015 10:18:27 -0500
>Alan Grimes wrote:
>
>> Hey, thanks for putting out gcc 5.3...
>>
>> Unfortunately, it fails to bootstrap on my machine. I am getting
>> differences between the stage 2 and stage 3 compilers and it's
>> dying... =(
[..]
Adam Carter writes:
>> They are wrong because there is no way for network traffic from the
>> devices on the LAN to make it to the interface enp2s0. Or, if they do
>> make it there, then there is something else seriously wrong.
>>
>
> tcpdump -i enp2s0 arp
>
> will tell you if the arps are being
Hi. I am doing my world update, and although it has noe finished, I am
now getting the message in the subject line if I try to execute any
python script! I found a gentoo topic which said to emerge python-exec,
but it has already done so in the update, and no joy.
Thanks in advance for any ideas
On 12/26/15 13:31, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
Hi. I am doing my world update, and although it has noe finished, I am
now getting the message in the subject line if I try to execute any
python script! I found a gentoo topic which said to emerge python-exec,
but it has already done so in the up
On Sat, Dec 26, 2015 at 9:14 AM, lee wrote:
>
> They are connected to different vlans on the same switch, so they don't
> share the same broadcast domain. The switch shows the mac addresses of
> the phones only in the expected vlan.
>
Out of curiosity, have you tried actually sending a broadcast
Urs Schütz wrote:
> On 12/26/15 13:31, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
> > Hi. I am doing my world update, and although it has noe finished, I am
> > now getting the message in the subject line if I try to execute any
> > python script! I found a gentoo topic which said to emerge python-exec,
> >
lee yagibdah.de> writes:
> >> They are wrong because there is no way for network traffic from the
> >> devices on the LAN to make it to the interface enp2s0. Or, if they do
> >> make it there, then there is something else seriously wrong.
Absolutely. ARP has been around a very long time (rfc
> Yes, I already tried that and didn't get any traffic listed.
>
In that case it sounds like linux has bridged them across from the other
interface. Does this find anything?
tcpdump -i enp2s0 net 192.168.1.0/24
If it doesn't maybe generate some layer2 broadcast traffic on enp1s0 to see
if you can
9 matches
Mail list logo
