On Thu, 11 Aug 2016 06:51:29 +0100, Peter Humphrey
wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 Aug 2016 19:26:56 Mick wrote:
>
> > Peter, I recall you being a long term sufferer of Kmail2 problems, which I
> > do not experience here.
>
> Yes, I have some old archives preserved as tar.bz2 files, but I can't import
On August 11, 2016 7:51:29 AM GMT+02:00, Peter Humphrey
wrote:
>On Wednesday 10 Aug 2016 19:26:56 Mick wrote:
>
>> Peter, I recall you being a long term sufferer of Kmail2 problems,
>which I
>> do not experience here.
>
>Yes, I have some old archives preserved as tar.bz2 files, but I can't
>impor
On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 9:43 AM, james wrote:
> I guess my point is 'Douglas' is full of stuffing, OR that is what folks
> are doing when they 'role their own solution specifically customized to
> their specific needs' as he alludes to near the end of his commentary? (I'd
> like your opinion of th
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 1:51 AM, james wrote:
> Douglas did manage to pull his own bacon from the fire, in the end of his
> article, but it wreaks of vendor hyperbole, imho.
>
Again, not the author
--
{
"name": "douglas j hunley",
"email": "doug.hun...@gmail.com",
"social": [
{
* Peter Humphrey [160811 01:29]:
> On Wednesday 10 Aug 2016 15:21:54 Philip Webb wrote:
> > 160810 Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > > I've been using KMail for many years. It suits me in many ways,
> > > the most important being that I don't need to keep switching my hands
> > > between mouse and keyboar
5 matches
Mail list logo
