Re: [gentoo-user] Need help to compile a minimal wine

2017-09-24 Thread tuxic
On 09/23 06:39, R0b0t1 wrote: > On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 1:21 PM, wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I want to compile wine to execute a single commandline tool. > > That's it. > > > > The commandline tool is the AVR-assembler made by ATmel to recompile > > a FORTH interpreter for the

Re: [gentoo-user] Changing dependencies without upping version ??

2017-09-24 Thread Rich Freeman
On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 2:51 PM, John Blinka wrote: > >> Is this an officially approved technique?? it is DIRTY. > > I imagine that it is sanctioned, otherwise why would there be a > --changed-deps flag to emerge? Does seem dirty. Glad you asked the > question. Would

[gentoo-user] Re: Changing dependencies without upping version ??

2017-09-24 Thread Ian Zimmerman
On 2017-09-24 21:05, Neil Bothwick wrote: > If the change doesn't affect the installed code, it is encouraged to > avoid unnecessary rebuilding. > > For example, a new version of LibreOffice or Chromium depends on > libfoo, but the dev doesn't notice and already has libfoo installed so > it

Re: [gentoo-user] Thunderbird build failure

2017-09-24 Thread Mick
On Sunday, 24 September 2017 21:37:16 BST Christoph Böhmwalder wrote: > Hey, you fixed it (sort of)! > > I tried your suggestions but diverted a little bit. Basically here's what > happened: > > * depclean did nothing (except remove a few Thunderbird dependencies I > actually needed, whoops) *

Re: [gentoo-user] Thunderbird build failure

2017-09-24 Thread Christoph Böhmwalder
Hey, you fixed it (sort of)! I tried your suggestions but diverted a little bit. Basically here's what happened: * depclean did nothing (except remove a few Thunderbird dependencies I actually needed, whoops) * `revdep-rebuild` also found nothing * `ldd` gave /lib/libz.so.1.2.11 * I noticed

Re: [gentoo-user] Changing dependencies without upping version ??

2017-09-24 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Sun, 24 Sep 2017 10:37:53 -0700, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > Is this an officially approved technique?? it is DIRTY. If the change doesn't affect the installed code, it is encouraged to avoid unnecessary rebuilding. For example, a new version of LibreOffice or Chromium depends on libfoo, but the

Re: [gentoo-user] Changing dependencies without upping version ??

2017-09-24 Thread John Blinka
> > > Is this an officially approved technique?? it is DIRTY. I imagine that it is sanctioned, otherwise why would there be a --changed-deps flag to emerge? Does seem dirty. Glad you asked the question. Would love to learn why this is allowed. In my experience, it happens quite often. John

[gentoo-user] Changing dependencies without upping version ??

2017-09-24 Thread Ian Zimmerman
I think this is the first time a package tried to play this trick on me: --- /var/db/pkg/dev-libs/qcustomplot-1.3.2/qcustomplot-1.3.2.ebuild 2017-05-21 13:38:15.482740587 -0700 +++ /usr/portage/dev-libs/qcustomplot/qcustomplot-1.3.2.ebuild 2017-09-22 19:27:30.0 -0700 @@ -1,4 +1,4

Re: [gentoo-user] Thunderbird build failure

2017-09-24 Thread Daniel Frey
On 09/23/2017 10:55 PM, Christoph Böhmwalder wrote: Thanks for the suggestion Stephano. I tried re-emerging libpng and running a clean Thunderbirs build overnight, however it still fails with the same message. -- Regards, Christoph I had a similar problem but it was a while ago (a couple