On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 16:51:27 +1100, Adam Carter wrote:
> When i depclean i use -av --depclean --exclude gcc --exclude
> gentoo-sources, since i like keep 2 gcc's around and I look after
> sources manually.
You can prevent depclean from removing gcc and kernel like this
% cat /etc/portage/sets.co
On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 04:06:52 +0100, David Haller wrote:
> # wc -l /var/lib/portage/world
> 1140 /var/lib/portage/world
>
> Am I doing something wrong? Looking it over, it looks right though.
It sounds a lot, but only you know what you need. For comparison I have
217 packages in world plus about
On 12/18/2017 03:25 PM, David Haller wrote:
>
> ISTR, .localdomain is the new .local...
>
> BTW: I hate it how .local got ursurped by zeroconf/mDNS.
>
You were never allowed to use .local in the first place =P
I learned some interesting things from RFC 8244, the first being that
they have an u
On 12/18/2017 04:58 PM, Bill Kenworthy wrote:
>
> I have used .localdomain for years without issue. VLANS
> (wifi.localdomain, lan.localdomain etc.) are great if you have the
> hardware to do it.
>
> Using non-official TLD internally shouldn't cause any problems (unless
> someone is "stupid").
On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 08:59:10 -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> > I have used .localdomain for years without issue. VLANS
> > (wifi.localdomain, lan.localdomain etc.) are great if you have the
> > hardware to do it.
> >
> > Using non-official TLD internally shouldn't cause any problems (unless
> >
On 12/19/2017 10:15:46 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
Having said that, everything built with gcc-7.2.0 after the profile
switch
so I now have only one gcc installed for the first time in years.
In addition. I keep gcc-6.4.0 since it can generate PIE-enabled
executables AND it it the last compile
On 19/12/17 13:57, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> There are no safe, free names to use for an internal network. On the one
> hand, RFC 8244 makes a decent argument that this is a good thing,
> because it guarantees that every hostname is globally unique (so if I
> copy/paste a URL to you, it goes the sa
On Tuesday, 19 December 2017 16:39:50 GMT Wols Lists wrote:
> On 19/12/17 13:57, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> > There are no safe, free names to use for an internal network. On the one
> > hand, RFC 8244 makes a decent argument that this is a good thing,
> > because it guarantees that every hostname i
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 7:57 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 12/18/2017 03:25 PM, David Haller wrote:
>>
>> ISTR, .localdomain is the new .local...
>>
>> BTW: I hate it how .local got ursurped by zeroconf/mDNS.
>>
>
> You were never allowed to use .local in the first place =P
>
> I learned some i
On 2017-12-18 08:56, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> You should probably buy a TLD.
(Understood that you mean "buy a domain".)
I'd like to remind everyone (again?) of FreeDNS (aka afraid.org). You
can get a 3rd level name free, and then subdivide that as you like.
They won't _delegate_ to you (unless
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 16:51:27 +1100, Adam Carter wrote:
>
>> When i depclean i use -av --depclean --exclude gcc --exclude
>> gentoo-sources, since i like keep 2 gcc's around and I look after
>> sources manually.
> You can prevent depclean from removing gcc and kernel like this
On 12/19/2017 12:22 PM, R0b0t1 wrote:
>
> There are; .local and .localhost are reserved TLDs.
.local is reserved for Apple's multicast DNS stuff, which requires names
to be resolved via a nonstandard method:
Any DNS query for a name ending with ".local." MUST be sent to the
mDNS IPv4 link-l
On Tue 19 Dec 2017 at 16:45:15 +0100, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> In addition. I keep gcc-6.4.0 since it can generate PIE-enabled
> executables AND it it the last compiler with 'gcj'.
>
> I don't understand why 'pdftk' and packages depending on that have been
> masked.
>
> They build and run fin
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 11:58 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 12/19/2017 12:22 PM, R0b0t1 wrote:
>>
>> There are; .local and .localhost are reserved TLDs.
>
>
> .local is reserved for Apple's multicast DNS stuff, which requires names
> to be resolved via a nonstandard method:
>
> Any DNS query
On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 11:45:58 -0600, Dale wrote:
> > You can prevent depclean from removing gcc and kernel like this
> >
> > % cat /etc/portage/sets.conf
> > [kernels]
> > class = portage.sets.dbapi.OwnerSet
> > world-candidate = False
> > files = /usr/src
> >
> > [gcc]
> > class = portage.sets.dba
On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 17:00:33 +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> * [OT]What's the difference between intervention and
> interference? None that I can see. One is just more Politically Crass -
> oops! Correct - than the other.
It's not about political correctness but perspective. The good guys
Finishing off an install, and running "emerge --depclean"
=
>>> Assigning files to packages...
* In order to avoid breakage of link level dependencies, one or more
* packages will not be removed. This can be solved by rebuildi
On 19/12/17 23:18, Walter Dnes wrote:
Finishing off an install, and running "emerge --depclean"
=
Assigning files to packages...
* In order to avoid breakage of link level dependencies, one or more
* packages will not b
On Tuesday, 19 December 2017 20:31:42 GMT Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 17:00:33 +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > * [OT] What's the difference between intervention and
> > interference? None that I can see. One is just more Politically Crass -
> > oops! Correct - than the other.
>
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 11:43:35PM +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote
> Unmerge it anyway and then rebuild iproute2. It seems like an automagic
> dep. It should not be using db when the berkdb USE flag is not set.
> Since it does, it's a bug.
>
> However, rebuilding it after unmerging db should fix
On Wed, 20 Dec 2017 00:33:08 +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > It's not about political correctness but perspective. The good guys
> > intervene, the baddies interfere. It's like the difference between a
> > terrorist and a freedom fighter.
>
> We could mince words all day.
No we couldn't, that
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 8:15 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 16:51:27 +1100, Adam Carter wrote:
>
> > When i depclean i use -av --depclean --exclude gcc --exclude
> > gentoo-sources, since i like keep 2 gcc's around and I look after
> > sources manually.
>
> You can prevent depclea
On Wednesday, 20 December 2017 01:09:30 GMT Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Dec 2017 00:33:08 +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > > It's not about political correctness but perspective. The good guys
> > > intervene, the baddies interfere. It's like the difference between a
> > > terrorist and a fre
On Monday, 18 December 2017 10:57:31 GMT Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Dec 2017 10:45:30 +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> >
> > Coincidentally, I'd recently also ended my subscription to the magazine.
> >
> :-(
Well, after many years of devoted service, they seem to have lost their way.
I've
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 7:31 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 17:00:33 +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
>
> > * [OT]What's the difference between intervention and
> > interference? None that I can see. One is just more Politically Crass -
> > oops! Correct - than the other.
>
>
25 matches
Mail list logo