I updated Ssh yesterday :
net-misc/openssh
Available versions: 7.5_p1-r4 7.7_p1-r9^t 7.9_p1-r4^t {X X509 audit bindist
debug (+)hpn kerberos ldap ldns libedit libressl livecd pam +pie sctp selinux
skey ssh1 +ssl static test ABI_MIPS="n32" KERNEL="linux"}
Installed versions: 7.9_p1-r4^t([
Just as a test set the 'icu inspector' USE FLAGS for net-libs/nodejs,
Then try this command, it should show how many packages would be pulled
in and their USE FLAGS :
emerge -pvt net-libs/nodejs
On 3/9/19 4:24 PM, allan gottlieb wrote:
> In trying to emerge chromium I received an error msg saying
My apologies for wasting everybody's time. I think that I
misinterpreted https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Layman and did a mix of the
config method for both version 2.1.0 and later as well as versions prior
to 2.1.0 Needless to say, the system was badly confused.
I removed all overlays, unmerged
On Saturday, 9 March 2019 20:04:46 GMT Walter Dnes wrote:
> I originally had...
>
> [palemoon]
> priority = 50
> location = /var/lib/layman/palemoon
> layman-type = git
> auto-sync = No
>
> I ran "layman -S"; no difference. I copied your config, ran "layman -S"
> and now I get...
>
> ===
On 10/03/2019 00:24, allan gottlieb wrote:
The following REQUIRED_USE flag constraints are unsatisfied:
inspector? ( icu )
The above constraints are a subset of the following complete expression:
python_targets_python2_7 inspector? ( icu ssl ) npm? ( ssl )
This seems more seriou
In trying to emerge chromium I received an error msg saying that
net-libs/nodejs needed the "inspector" USE flag.
I added
>=net-libs/nodejs-8.12.0 inspector
to
/etc/portage/package.use chromium
Now I receive the msg
!!! The ebuild selected to satisfy ">=net-libs/nodejs-7.6.0[inspecto
On 06/03/2019 14:39, Mick wrote:
To date I have not found, or cannot recall, an occasion where revdep-rebuild
rebuilt anything following a run of @preserved-rebuild. I have stopped
running revdep-rebuild.sh for years now thinking it is redundant.
@preserved-rebuild is only able to detect cases
Thank you both, I knew there was a command. Did get it working with flags for
similar processor but obviously the goal is to optimize for the hardware i
have. Just couldn't remember how you got the cpu flags.
If you like computers that sound like a pile of angry hair dryers servers are a
re
I originally had...
[palemoon]
priority = 50
location = /var/lib/layman/palemoon
layman-type = git
auto-sync = No
I ran "layman -S"; no difference. I copied your config, ran "layman -S"
and now I get...
=
[i660][root][~
According to GCC :
CPUs based on AMD Family 10h cores with x86-64 instruction set support.
(This supersets MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A, 3DNow!, enhanced 3DNow!,
ABM and 64-bit instruction set extensions.)
Best way to get that info :
( simplest way ) cat /proc/cpuinfo
( long form ) gcc -c -Q -marc
Hi!
On Sat, 9 Mar 2019 10:51:22 +0100 (CET)
mad.scientist.at.la...@tutanota.com wrote:
> can any one suggest flags for the make.conf file, i'm trying to build on an
> hp dl585 g7 with 4 amd 6180se, 12 core, cpu world says k10 microarchetecture,
> Maranello platform.
>
> When this works, I'll be
On 3/8/19 7:15 PM, Walter Dnes wrote:
>
> So I ran "layman -d ALL" followed by "layman -a palemoon". Now...
>
> [i660][root][~] cat /var/lib/layman/palemoon/profiles/repo_name
> palemoon
>
> ... but I still get the same warning! Some more info...
>
Apologies, if this a stupid question ..
Hi,
I am playing around with "Meshroom" -- an OpenSource software able to
create 3D-objects for Blender for example by scanning a bunch of
photos.
But...
Meshroom expects exspects image file to be dropped onto a certain
place of its gui...to make it really easy to use.
There is no "import" or "op
can any one suggest flags for the make.conf file, i'm trying to build on an hp
dl585 g7 with 4 amd 6180se, 12 core, cpu world says k10 microarchetecture,
Maranello platform.
When this works, I'll be upgrading to 6380 CPUs. All help appreciated.
"We the People Dare to Create a More Perfect Uni
14 matches
Mail list logo
