On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 4:06 AM Mick wrote:
> On Saturday, 13 July 2019 18:42:27 BST Jack wrote:
> >
> > If linux-firmware is emerged with the savedconfig use flag, then only
> > the firmware not deleted from the config file is left.
>
> Yes. I used to do this, but gave up after a while.
On 2019-07-13 19:06, Mick wrote:
> > If linux-firmware is emerged with the savedconfig use flag, then
> > only the firmware not deleted from the config file is left.
>
> Yes. I used to do this, but gave up after a while.
I find it odd that there is apparently no central way to track which
> Then I came across this old message regarding Piledriver CPUs:
>
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-security/2016/03/msg00084.html
>
> The post refers to model 2 of cpu family 21. Not all models in the same
> family, only model 2. So I am thinking although patch files are named per
> CPU
>
On Saturday, 13 July 2019 23:03:11 BST Mick wrote:
> Unlike my old Intel which lights up like a christmas tree with "Vulnerable,
> no microcode found" because Intel has thrown its users to the kerb, both
> AMDs show "Not Vulnerable" and for some of the vulnerabilities it reports:
>
> (your CPU
OpenRC is great, and I see runnit as a viable option available with Gentoo.
I have been running Void on another Machine and absolutely loving the
runnit experience, and wanted to know if there were any plans to create a
runnit profile for Gentoo?
Best,
Raylier
5 matches
Mail list logo
