On Thu, 29 Jul 2021 23:20:59 -0400,
the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>
>
> On 7/29/21 9:10 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> [snip]
> > It seems to me "dev-lang/perl-5.34" was made stable and it is causing a
> > problem.
> >
>
> I've tried to block perl-5.34 but I'm getting another conflict:
>
On Friday, 30 July 2021 09:20:45 BST John Covici wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Jul 2021 23:20:59 -0400,
>
> the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> > On 7/29/21 9:10 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> > [snip]
> >
> > > It seems to me "dev-lang/perl-5.34" was made stable and it is causing a
> > > problem.>
> > I
On Thu, 2021-07-29 at 20:42 -0600, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> I'm trying to run an upgrade but I got stuck on perl:
>
> !!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been
> pulled
> !!! into the dependency graph, resulting in a slot conflict:
>
> dev-lang/perl:0
>
Addin
Am Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 11:31:48PM +0200 schrieb Frank Steinmetzger:
> Am Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 10:55:18PM +0200 schrieb Frank Steinmetzger:
> > In case someone is interested, here’s a little experience report:
> > […]
> > I just finished transferring my existing Borg backup repos.
> > […]
> > I’ve
On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 1:14 AM William Kenworthy wrote:
>
> 2. btrfs scrub (a couple of days)
>
Was this a read-only scrub, or did this involve repair (such as after
losing a disk/etc)?
My understanding of SMR is that it is supposed to perform identically
to CMR for reads. If you've just recen
On 30/07/2021 15:29, Rich Freeman wrote:
Honestly I feel like the whole SMR thing is a missed opportunity,
mainly because manufacturers decided to use it as a way to save a few
bucks instead of as a new technology that can be embraced as long as
you understand its benefits and limitations. One t
Neil Bothwick wrote:
>
> In a normal situation, with only one init system installed, there is no
> need to do anything, because the virtual takes care of making sure it is
> not deleted.
It is not only about non-deletion. It is also about updating.
Suppose that you have installed openrc and syste
On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 12:50 PM antlists wrote:
>
> On 30/07/2021 15:29, Rich Freeman wrote:
> > Honestly I feel like the whole SMR thing is a missed opportunity,
> > mainly because manufacturers decided to use it as a way to save a few
> > bucks instead of as a new technology that can be embrace
On 2021-07-30, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> I'm trying to run an upgrade but I got stuck on perl:
[...]
> (dev-lang/perl-5.34.0:0/5.34::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) USE="gdbm
> -berkdb -debug -doc -ithreads -minimal" ABI_X86="(64)" pulled in by
[...]
> Running: "perl-cleaner --all" g
On 2021-07-30, nunojsi...@ist.utl.pt wrote:
> On 2021-07-30, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>
>> I'm trying to run an upgrade but I got stuck on perl:
> [...]
>> (dev-lang/perl-5.34.0:0/5.34::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge)
>> USE="gdbm -berkdb -debug -doc -ithreads -minimal" ABI_X86="(64)"
>
On Fri, 30 Jul 2021 18:30:28 - (UTC), Martin Vaeth wrote:
> > In a normal situation, with only one init system installed, there is
> > no need to do anything, because the virtual takes care of making sure
> > it is not deleted.
>
> It is not only about non-deletion. It is also about updatin
On Fri, 2021-07-30 at 07:08 -0400, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On Thu, 2021-07-29 at 20:42 -0600, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> > I'm trying to run an upgrade but I got stuck on perl:
> >
> > !!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been
> > pulled
> > !!! into the dependen
On 30/7/21 10:29 pm, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 1:14 AM William Kenworthy wrote:
>> 2. btrfs scrub (a couple of days)
>>
> Was this a read-only scrub, or did this involve repair (such as after
> losing a disk/etc)?
>
> My understanding of SMR is that it is supposed to perform
On 31/07/21 04:14, William Kenworthy wrote:
> (seagate lists it as a 5Tb drive managed SMR)
>
> It was sold as a USB3 4Tb desktop expansion drive, fdisk -l shows "Disk
> /dev/sde: 3.64 TiB, 4000787029504 bytes, 7814037167 sectors" and Seagate
> is calling it 5Tb - marketing!
Note that it's now of
On 31/7/21 11:50 am, Wols Lists wrote:
> On 31/07/21 04:14, William Kenworthy wrote:
>> (seagate lists it as a 5Tb drive managed SMR)
>>
>> It was sold as a USB3 4Tb desktop expansion drive, fdisk -l shows "Disk
>> /dev/sde: 3.64 TiB, 4000787029504 bytes, 7814037167 sectors" and Seagate
>> is cal
On 31/7/21 11:14 am, William Kenworthy wrote:
> On 30/7/21 10:29 pm, Rich Freeman wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 1:14 AM William Kenworthy wrote:
>>> 2. btrfs scrub (a couple of days)
>>>
>> Was this a read-only scrub, or did this involve repair (such as after
>> losing a disk/etc)?
>>
>> My
On 31/7/21 4:50 am, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On Fri, 2021-07-30 at 07:08 -0400, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>> On Thu, 2021-07-29 at 20:42 -0600, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>>> I'm trying to run an upgrade but I got stuck on perl:
>>>
>>> !!! Multiple package instances within a single package slo
17 matches
Mail list logo
