On 22/10/23 11:23, Dale wrote:
Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
Am Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 09:20:45PM -0500 schrieb Dale:
Howdy,
As most know, I had to restore from backups recently. I also reworked
my NAS box. I'm doing my first backup given that I have more files that
need to be added to the backu
Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> Am Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 09:20:45PM -0500 schrieb Dale:
>> Howdy,
>>
>> As most know, I had to restore from backups recently. I also reworked
>> my NAS box. I'm doing my first backup given that I have more files that
>> need to be added to the backups. When I started t
Am Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 09:20:45PM -0500 schrieb Dale:
> Howdy,
>
> As most know, I had to restore from backups recently. I also reworked
> my NAS box. I'm doing my first backup given that I have more files that
> need to be added to the backups. When I started the rsync, it's
> starting from t
Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
> Am 21. Oktober 2023 07:07:18 UTC schrieb Dale :
>> Actually, I was looking at the man page again and that option appeared
>> to me just a little bit ago. I tried it and it did several updates.
>> Question tho. It finished that update just a minute ago. I tried again
>>
Not (unfortunately) speaking from my own experience, just from Googling:
https://serverfault.com/questions/211005/rsync-difference-between-checksum-and-ignore-times-options
discusses a —ignore-times option that may be useful. The upside is that it
uses the minimum amount of network bandwidth but
On Saturday, 21 October 2023 03:20:45 BST Dale wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> As most know, I had to restore from backups recently. I also reworked
> my NAS box. I'm doing my first backup given that I have more files that
> need to be added to the backups. When I started the rsync, it's
> starting from th
Am 21. Oktober 2023 07:07:18 UTC schrieb Dale :
>Actually, I was looking at the man page again and that option appeared
>to me just a little bit ago. I tried it and it did several updates.
>Question tho. It finished that update just a minute ago. I tried again
>with my usual command, it wants t
Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
>> I looked at the man page and the options there. I don't see anything
>> that I think will help. Is there a way around this?
> Then you didn't read properly, the man page is really exhaustive. You can try
> "--size-only".
> It is also possible to negate the options by p
8 matches
Mail list logo
