On 2017-12-12 02:36, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
> Hi,
>
> before the profile was updated this compiles fine. My system
> was (say before my personal profilegeddon) and is not multilib.
> So why is that a problem as it was not before...?
>
>
>
>>>> Source compiled.
>>>> Test phase [not enabled]: x11-misc/slop-6.3.46
>
>>>> Install slop-6.3.46 into /var/tmp/portage/x11-misc/slop-6.3.46/image/ 
>>>> category x11-misc
>>>> Working in BUILD_DIR: 
>>>> "/var/tmp/portage/x11-misc/slop-6.3.46/work/slop-6.3.46_build"
> make -j6 install 
> [ 87%] Built target slopy
> [100%] Built target slop
> Install the project...
> -- Install configuration: "Gentoo"
> -- Installing: /var/tmp/portage/x11-misc/slop-6.3.46/image/usr/bin/slop
> -- Set runtime path of 
> "/var/tmp/portage/x11-misc/slop-6.3.46/image//usr/bin/slop" to ""
> -- Installing: /var/tmp/portage/x11-misc/slop-6.3.46/image/usr/lib/libslopy.so
> -- Installing: 
> /var/tmp/portage/x11-misc/slop-6.3.46/image/usr/include/slop.hpp
> -- Installing: 
> /var/tmp/portage/x11-misc/slop-6.3.46/image/usr/share/man/man1/slop.1.gz
>>>> Completed installing slop-6.3.46 into 
>>>> /var/tmp/portage/x11-misc/slop-6.3.46/image/
>
>  * Final size of build directory: 2448 KiB (2.3 MiB)
>  * Final size of installed tree:   624 KiB
>
> Files matching a file type that is not allowed:
>    usr/lib/libslopy.so
>  * ERROR: x11-misc/slop-6.3.46::gentoo failed:
>  *   multilib-strict check failed!
>  * 
>  * Call stack:
>  *   misc-functions.sh, line 666:  Called install_qa_check
>  *   misc-functions.sh, line 217:  Called source 'install_symlink_html_docs'
>  *   80multilib-strict, line  46:  Called multilib_strict_check
>  *   80multilib-strict, line  42:  Called die
>  * The specific snippet of code:
>  *            [[ ${abort} == yes ]] && die "multilib-strict check failed!"
>  * 
>
> As always...any survival tips are very welcome...;)
>
> Cheers
> Meino

Hi,

You are not alone. I encountered the same problem here.
On my machine slop-6.3.46 and maim-5.4.63 does not build no matter how I
try...

So I just masked both version ;-)

Danny

Reply via email to