Re: [gentoo-user] About runlevel's

2005-05-08 Thread Pere Gentoo
What about this way: I've seen it on http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_create_a_run_level # mkdir /etc/runlevels/noxdm # rc-update add x noxdm(add all services from the default runlevel except xdm) Modify /etc/inittab id:3:initdefault: id:3:initnoxdm: l3:3:wait:/sbin

Re: [gentoo-user] euse error

2005-05-08 Thread Pere Gentoo
Thanks, -- Pere ( -- Aesux -- ) -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-user] euse error

2005-05-07 Thread Pere Gentoo
Hi, I'm getting an error using euse. Here is the stdout + stderr from euse -c readlink: too many arguments Try `readlink --help' for more information. /usr/bin/euse: line 199: /make.defaults: No such file or directory readlink: too many arguments Try `readlink --help' for more information. /us

Re: [gentoo-user] About runlevel's

2005-05-07 Thread Pere Gentoo
On 5/7/05, Mark Shields <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think you're missing what he wants (and what I wanted to). See: > http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_create_a_run_level > And after creating the new runlevel, is it possible to modify /etc/inittab so we could define the new runlevel in it without

Re: [gentoo-user] About runlevel's

2005-05-07 Thread Pere Gentoo
On 5/7/05, Mark Shields <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think you're missing what he wants (and what I wanted to). See: > http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_create_a_run_level > Thanks, this is what I was looking for. And of course this is the logical solution. Thanks, -- Pere ( -- Aesux -- ) --

Re: [gentoo-user] About runlevel's

2005-05-07 Thread Pere Gentoo
Yes, of course, this is the unique differences between runlevel 3 and 5, but I think it should be enough, isn't it? I think have or not have the X working was a big difference about resource using, isn't it? Why not maintain this difference with a run level? Thanks, On 5/7/05, A. Khattri <[EMA

[gentoo-user] About runlevel's

2005-05-07 Thread Pere Gentoo
I see, in Gentoo, we work for runlevel groups and not the individual runlevels 0,1,2,3,4,5 and 6. They are resumed as boot, single, nonetwork and default. Fine. But how to get a runlevel as runlevel 3 on other distributions, with the same services and daemons as runevelel 5 or default but without

Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge break

2005-05-03 Thread Pere Gentoo
one USE flag, then each package will install with its default flags, isn't it? Would this be a good idea for a begginer? > FEATURE="keepwork" will cost you *a lot* of diskspace. If you build a > complete system with this enabled, be prepared to spend a 50Gb+ disk > just for /var/tmp/portage. > I see keepwork is not a really good idea. > Christoph > Thanks for all Would be easy to go inside Gentoo with an active list like this. I think, no? Pere -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge break

2005-05-03 Thread Pere Gentoo
and then not repats the part of the work which has been done previously? Thanks, Pere -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge break

2005-05-03 Thread Pere Gentoo
Pere On 5/3/05, Christoph Gysin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Pere Gentoo wrote: > > >If I emerge again KDE, what would happens? Emerge will continue on the > >point i t has break? or it will begin again from the beginning? If it > >begins again could there be an

Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge break

2005-05-03 Thread Pere Gentoo
Thanks, The sysem has been rebooted. I get an error after emerge --resume "Emerge: It seems we have nothing to resume..." Thanks again, Pere On 5/3/05, Karsten Baumgarten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > emer

[gentoo-user] Emerge break

2005-05-03 Thread Pere Gentoo
again could there be any problem whit the files it have generated the first emerge process? What is the best way to correct that? Thanks in advance, Pere -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list