> Thankfully, I've never had to
> maintain systems whose disks were small and low performing enough that
> it actually mattered to separate / from /usr.
So you don't understand it much at all. Actually many of lennarts pages
such as his security.html are full of wildly incorrect claims and
innaccu
Am Tue, 18 Dec 2012 13:34:07 +
schrieb Kevin Chadwick :
[...]
> Going back in time
> his claim of pulse audio being good for professional audio was also
> completely off the mark. Seperating Gnome and pulse can now cause pro
> audio users on binary distro's major headaches too. I pointed one
>
Am Dienstag, 18. Dezember 2012, 23:02:41 schrieb Marc Joliet:
> Am Tue, 18 Dec 2012 13:34:07 +
> schrieb Kevin Chadwick :
>
> [...]
>
> > Going back in time
> > his claim of pulse audio being good for professional audio was also
> > completely off the mark. Seperating Gnome and pulse can now
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 07:48:45PM +0100, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote
>
> remember this? a solution without a problem to solve, making a lot
> of people's lifes harder, dropped onto them by the godlike Lennart P.?
> http://lalists.stanford.edu/lad/2009/06/0218.html
The thread was started by Lenn
> It was in fact a weirdo corner case
> since day 1.
Right, a weirdo corner case that is part of best practice and the
default suggestion on debian stable used on many many servers and for
good reason.
--
___
'Write programs th
Again you don't break the spec unless you have to and you don't change
the spec unless it is an improvement or you have no choice. Non of
which is the case. Just like you do not mould a mail RFC to a
widely used technically inferior hotmail implementation.
> He's like DJB on crack.
Except DJB ma
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 12:28 AM, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
>
> Again you don't break the spec unless you have to and you don't change
> the spec unless it is an improvement or you have no choice. Non of
> which is the case. Just like you do not mould a mail RFC to a
> widely used technically inferior
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Mark David Dumlao wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 12:28 AM, Kevin Chadwick
> wrote:
> >
> > Again you don't break the spec unless you have to and you don't change
> > the spec unless it is an improvement or you have no choice. Non of
> > which is the case. Just l
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 2:40 AM, Michael Mol wrote:
>> or the fact that some udev programs tend to
>> be located in /usr,
>
>
> That's either a bug with those programs, or a need for architectural
> improvements within udev. Both plausible answers.
>
The most obvious architectural improvement bei
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Mark David Dumlao wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 2:40 AM, Michael Mol wrote:
>>> or the fact that some udev programs tend to
>>> be located in /usr,
>>
>>
>> That's either a bug with those programs, or a need for architectural
>> improvements within udev. Both p
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 4:59 AM, Michael Mol wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Mark David Dumlao wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 2:40 AM, Michael Mol wrote:
or the fact that some udev programs tend to
be located in /usr,
>>>
>>>
>>> That's either a bug with those programs, or
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Mark David Dumlao
wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 4:59 AM, Michael Mol wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Mark David Dumlao
wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 2:40 AM, Michael Mol wrote:
> or the fact that some udev programs tend to
> be located
> > Should perl be in / or /usr?
>
> Now that is a good question, if only because Perl traditionally _loathes_
> being in /bin, for its own philosophical reasons.
>
> Now, as a practical matter? WTF are the scripts written in Perl? Or in
> anything other than sh? If they're intended for emerg
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
>> > Should perl be in / or /usr?
>>
>> Now that is a good question, if only because Perl traditionally _loathes_
>> being in /bin, for its own philosophical reasons.
>>
>
>
>> Now, as a practical matter? WTF are the scripts written in Perl? O
On Fri, 4 Jan 2013 18:22:37 -0500
"Mike Edenfield" wrote:
> I have never personally run into any case
> where I had a single /+/usr and regretted it, but I *have* encountered
> situations where I could not get /usr mounted and ended up merging it
> with /. FWIW, YMMV, etc.
And why was that, not
15 matches
Mail list logo
