On 11/22/2021 03:08:46 PM, Julien Roy wrote:
emerge -pv --depclean dev-libs/imath
Many thanks,
Helmut
Hi,
emerge -vp @preserved-rebuild only displays
emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy "dev-libs/imath:0".
(dependency required by "@preserved-rebuild" [argument])
How to find out what requires dev-libs/imath:0 and how to fix that?
Many thanks for a hint,
Helmut
> On 2018-12-29, at 12:33, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
>
> On 12/29/2018 05:03:51 PM, Andrew Udvare wrote:
>> > On Dec 29, 2018, at 10:47, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
>> >
>> > How can I find out the list of packages in @preserved-rebuild?
>> There's a JSON file in /var/db/portage
>
> I don't have the
On 12/29/2018 05:09:02 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 11:03 AM Andrew Udvare
wrote:
>
> > On Dec 29, 2018, at 10:47, Helmut Jarausch
wrote:
> >
> > How can I find out the list of packages in @preserved-rebuild?
>
> There's a JSON file in /var/db/portage
>
Not sure if ther
On 12/29/2018 05:03:51 PM, Andrew Udvare wrote:
> On Dec 29, 2018, at 10:47, Helmut Jarausch
wrote:
>
> How can I find out the list of packages in @preserved-rebuild?
There's a JSON file in /var/db/portage
I don't have the folder /var/db/portage here.
Thanks,
Helmut
On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 11:03 AM Andrew Udvare wrote:
>
> > On Dec 29, 2018, at 10:47, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> >
> > How can I find out the list of packages in @preserved-rebuild?
>
> There's a JSON file in /var/db/portage
>
Not sure if there is anything that directly targets the API here, but
> On Dec 29, 2018, at 10:47, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
>
> How can I find out the list of packages in @preserved-rebuild?
There's a JSON file in /var/db/portage
Hi,
I have some old packages like dev-qt/qtcore:4 on my machine, and other
packages which need this.
Therefore emerge -vp @preserved-rebuild doesn't work.
How can I find out the list of packages in @preserved-rebuild?
Many thanks for a hint,
Helmut
On Wed, Dec 07 2016, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 12:30 PM, allan gottlieb wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 07 2016, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 07 Dec 2016 10:54:59 -0500, allan gottlieb wrote:
>>>
>>emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy "dev-lang/python:3.3".
>>
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 12:30 PM, allan gottlieb wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 07 2016, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 07 Dec 2016 10:54:59 -0500, allan gottlieb wrote:
>>
>>> >>emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy "dev-lang/python:3.3".
>>> >>(dependency required by "@preserved-rebuild" [argu
On Wed, Dec 07 2016, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Dec 2016 10:54:59 -0500, allan gottlieb wrote:
>
>> >>emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy "dev-lang/python:3.3".
>> >>(dependency required by "@preserved-rebuild" [argument])
>> >
>> > Does "qdepends -r dev-lang/python:3.3" revea
On Wed, 07 Dec 2016 10:54:59 -0500, allan gottlieb wrote:
> >>emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy "dev-lang/python:3.3".
> >>(dependency required by "@preserved-rebuild" [argument])
> >
> > Does "qdepends -r dev-lang/python:3.3" reveal anything helpful?
>
>allan ~ # qdepends -
On Wed, Dec 07 2016, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Dec 2016 10:11:56 -0500, allan gottlieb wrote:
>
>>emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy "dev-lang/python:3.3".
>>(dependency required by "@preserved-rebuild" [argument])
>
> Does "qdepends -r dev-lang/python:3.3" reveal anything hel
On Wed, 07 Dec 2016 10:11:56 -0500, allan gottlieb wrote:
>emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy "dev-lang/python:3.3".
>(dependency required by "@preserved-rebuild" [argument])
Does "qdepends -r dev-lang/python:3.3" reveal anything helpful?
--
Neil Bothwick
Computers are like Old T
On Wed, Dec 07 2016, Dale wrote:
> allan gottlieb wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 06 2016, Adam Carter wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 1:37 PM, allan gottlieb wrote:
>>>
I can't complete an emerge @preserved-rebuild due to the lack of
python3.3.
However, I read the news article and
allan gottlieb wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 06 2016, Adam Carter wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 1:37 PM, allan gottlieb wrote:
>>
>>> I can't complete an emerge @preserved-rebuild due to the lack of
>>> python3.3.
>>>
>>> However, I read the news article and have set the python3 interpreter to
>>> pyt
On Tue, Dec 06 2016, Adam Carter wrote:
> Also, what's your $PYTHON_TARGETS ?
emerge --info includes
PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET="python2_7" PYTHON_TARGETS="python2_7 python3_4"
which looks right to me.
thanks,
allan
On Tue, Dec 06 2016, Adam Carter wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 1:37 PM, allan gottlieb wrote:
>
>> I can't complete an emerge @preserved-rebuild due to the lack of
>> python3.3.
>>
>> However, I read the news article and have set the python3 interpreter to
>> python3.4
>>
>>allan ~ # eselec
Also, what's your $PYTHON_TARGETS ?
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 1:37 PM, allan gottlieb wrote:
> I can't complete an emerge @preserved-rebuild due to the lack of
> python3.3.
>
> However, I read the news article and have set the python3 interpreter to
> python3.4
>
>allan ~ # eselect python list --python3
>Available Python 3 int
I can't complete an emerge @preserved-rebuild due to the lack of
python3.3.
However, I read the news article and have set the python3 interpreter to
python3.4
allan ~ # eselect python list --python3
Available Python 3 interpreters:
[1] python3.3
[2] python3.4 *
allan ~ # es
Michael Cook wrote:
>
> Have you tried running python-updater? I have no idea if it would fix
> it, but worth a try?
>
>
I don't know if it would or not but removing the links that was
triggering it then running revdep-rebuild did fix it. It seems this is
one of those times that portage just can'
Have you tried running python-updater? I have no idea if it would fix it,
but worth a try?
On Mar 23, 2015 17:38, "Dale" wrote:
Howdy,
For the past week or so, I been getting this endless loop with
preserved-rebuild. I did a emerge -ev world last night and it still
gives me the same thing. I'm
Daniel Frey wrote:
> On 03/23/2015 05:12 PM, Dale wrote:
>> Is it me or does the search function at fgo pretty much stink? I find a
>> lot of times I type in something and where it should show what I
>> searched for, it is blank which means it kicked all my search terms
>> out. Surely it ain't ju
On 03/23/2015 05:12 PM, Dale wrote:
> Is it me or does the search function at fgo pretty much stink? I find a
> lot of times I type in something and where it should show what I
> searched for, it is blank which means it kicked all my search terms
> out. Surely it ain't just me. o_O
It's not jus
Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
>
> http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Preserve-libs
>
Wow. I searched the forums, googled and nothing helped. I never
thought to check the wiki, of course, I rarely go to the wiki either. I
keep forgetting the thing exists.
Is it me or does the search function at fgo prett
On Monday, March 23, 2015 4:38:08 PM Dale wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> For the past week or so, I been getting this endless loop with
> preserved-rebuild. I did a emerge -ev world last night and it still
> gives me the same thing. I'm stumped with the info emerge is giving me
> again.
>
> root@fireball
Howdy,
For the past week or so, I been getting this endless loop with
preserved-rebuild. I did a emerge -ev world last night and it still
gives me the same thing. I'm stumped with the info emerge is giving me
again.
root@fireball / # emerge @preserved-rebuild
These are the packages that would
On 09:51 Sun 15 Dec , Mick wrote:
> Not sure why, but for some reason running emerge @preserved-rebuild does not
> seem to fix some preserved libs links:
>
> !!! existing preserved libs:
> >>> package: x11-libs/pango-1.34.1
> * - /usr/lib/libpangox-1.0.so.0
> * - /usr/lib/libpangox-1.0.so
On Sun, 15 Dec 2013 09:51:39 +, Mick wrote:
> !!! existing preserved libs:
> >>> package: x11-libs/pango-1.34.1
> * - /usr/lib/libpangox-1.0.so.0
> * - /usr/lib/libpangox-1.0.so.0.3000.1
> * used by /opt/avast4workstation/bin/avastgui (app-
> antivirus/avast4workstation-1.3.0-r2)
>
Not sure why, but for some reason running emerge @preserved-rebuild does not
seem to fix some preserved libs links:
!!! existing preserved libs:
>>> package: x11-libs/pango-1.34.1
* - /usr/lib/libpangox-1.0.so.0
* - /usr/lib/libpangox-1.0.so.0.3000.1
This is all caused by some hack I have in
On 12/05/2013 13:29, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
> Neil Bothwick wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 12 May 2013 02:50:44 -0400, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
>>
>>> Hi. I am using gentoo unstable and after this last update when I tried
>>> to do emerge @preserved-rebuild I get the following:
>>
>> I didn't kno
130512 cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
> Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> On Sun, 12 May 2013 02:50:44 -0400, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
>>> I am using gentoo unstable ...
>> I didn't know Gentoo specifically made an unstable version,
>> it's generally rock solid for me.
> By unstable I meant ACCEPT_KEYWORD
Samuli Suominen wrote:
> On 12/05/13 14:29, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
> > Neil Bothwick wrote:
> >
> >> On Sun, 12 May 2013 02:50:44 -0400, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi. I am using gentoo unstable and after this last update when I tried
> >>> to do emerge @preserved-rebuild I g
On 12/05/13 14:29, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sun, 12 May 2013 02:50:44 -0400, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
Hi. I am using gentoo unstable and after this last update when I tried
to do emerge @preserved-rebuild I get the following:
I didn't know Gentoo specifical
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sun, 12 May 2013 02:50:44 -0400, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
>
> > Hi. I am using gentoo unstable and after this last update when I tried
> > to do emerge @preserved-rebuild I get the following:
>
> I didn't know Gentoo specifically made an unstable version, it's
> g
On Sun, 12 May 2013 02:50:44 -0400, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
> Hi. I am using gentoo unstable and after this last update when I tried
> to do emerge @preserved-rebuild I get the following:
I didn't know Gentoo specifically made an unstable version, it's
generally rock solid for me.
> These
Hi. I am using gentoo unstable and after this last update when I tried
to do emerge @preserved-rebuild I get the following:
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating dependencies done!
emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy "net-libs/xulrunner:1.9".
(dependency r
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 01:06:36 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > I agree that the tree should be in sync, but how come I was able to
> > unmerge the package? It must keep the information somewhere -- and it
> > didn't tell me anything about having packages with no ebuilds -- that
> > would have been
On Sunday 12 December 2010 21:41:08 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> One thing that is NOT a solution is to not delete the ebuild.
Eh? Not deleting the ebuild is not a solution? Is that what you meant to
say?
--
Rgds
Peter. Linux Counter 5290, 1994-04-23.
Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Alan McKinnon
> wrote:
> > Apparently, though unproven, at 23:10 on Sunday 12 December 2010,
> > cov...@ccs.covici.com did opine thusly:
> >
> >> Alan McKinnon wrote:
> >> > Apparently, though unproven, at 22:35 on Sunday 12 December 2010,
Apparently, though unproven, at 00:56 on Monday 13 December 2010,
cov...@ccs.covici.com did opine thusly:
> > One thing that is NOT a solution is to not delete the ebuild. That
> > results in your tree being out of sync with upstream. That is not
> > allowed.
>
> I agree that the tree should be
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Apparently, though unproven, at 23:10 on Sunday 12 December 2010,
> cov...@ccs.covici.com did opine thusly:
>
> > Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > > Apparently, though unproven, at 22:35 on Sunday 12 December 2010,
> > >
> > > cov...@ccs.covici.com did opine thusly:
> > > > Mar
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Apparently, though unproven, at 23:10 on Sunday 12 December 2010,
> cov...@ccs.covici.com did opine thusly:
>
>> Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> > Apparently, though unproven, at 22:35 on Sunday 12 December 2010,
>> >
>> > cov...@ccs.covici.com did
Apparently, though unproven, at 23:10 on Sunday 12 December 2010,
cov...@ccs.covici.com did opine thusly:
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > Apparently, though unproven, at 22:35 on Sunday 12 December 2010,
> >
> > cov...@ccs.covici.com did opine thusly:
> > > Mark Knecht wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Dec 12
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Apparently, though unproven, at 22:35 on Sunday 12 December 2010,
> cov...@ccs.covici.com did opine thusly:
>
> > Mark Knecht wrote:
> > > On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 10:48 AM, wrote:
> > > > I have a fair number of preserved-libs, but it will not run at all and
> > > > gi
Apparently, though unproven, at 22:35 on Sunday 12 December 2010,
cov...@ccs.covici.com did opine thusly:
> Mark Knecht wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 10:48 AM, wrote:
> > > I have a fair number of preserved-libs, but it will not run at all and
> > > gives the rather strange message:
> > >
Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 10:48 AM, wrote:
> > I have a fair number of preserved-libs, but it will not run at all and
> > gives the rather strange message:
> > Calculating dependencies... done!
> >
> > emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy "dev-tex/mplib:0".
> > (dependency
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 10:48 AM, wrote:
> I have a fair number of preserved-libs, but it will not run at all and
> gives the rather strange message:
> Calculating dependencies... done!
>
> emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy "dev-tex/mplib:0".
> (dependency required by "@preserved-rebuild")
I have a fair number of preserved-libs, but it will not run at all and
gives the rather strange message:
Calculating dependencies... done!
emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy "dev-tex/mplib:0".
(dependency required by "@preserved-rebuild")
Now I have no such package and an eix seems to indica
On Thursday 17 December 2009 19:51:33 James wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Well I keep getting the same 32 files to rebuild
> even after running 'emerge @preserved-rebuild'
> several times. Here is the list of files:
>
>
>
> ebuild R ] sys-fs/reiserfsprogs-3.6.19-r2
[snip]
ldd is your friend
run on
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 17:51:33 + (UTC), James wrote:
> Well I keep getting the same 32 files to rebuild
> even after running 'emerge @preserved-rebuild'
> several times. Here is the list of files:
Where is the list of libraries causing the need for the rebuild?
This is given in the message tha
Well,
I got the same problem in a recent past.
What I did to solve this problem was to remove sys-libs/e2fsprogs-libs and to
install it again:
emerge -C e2fsprogs-libs
emerge -van1 e2fsprogs-libs
But I don't if it is good for your case.
Regards,
--
Ronan Arraes Jardim Chagas
Control and Autom
Hello,
Well I keep getting the same 32 files to rebuild
even after running 'emerge @preserved-rebuild'
several times. Here is the list of files:
ebuild R ] sys-fs/reiserfsprogs-3.6.19-r2
[ebuild R ] sys-apps/util-linux-2.16.1
[ebuild R ] dev-libs/apr-1.3.9
[ebuild R ] sys-fs/cry
Dale wrote:
>
>
>
> Unmerging then emerging again fixed it. Is this a bug or just a one
> time boo boo?
>
> Dale
>
> :-) :-)
>
>
Well, it's back. I'm going to call this "unmasking creep". I had to
unmask and keyword some stuff until portage was happy to install the
updates.
I had to
On Tuesday 10 November 2009 20:50:35 Dale wrote:
> > Most likely avidemux and mplayer have hidden automagic dependencies on
> > x264 but they are not listed in DEPEND. So the packages need x264 but
> > portage doesn't know this.
> >
> > Try unmerge the whole lot and re-merge everything. This shoul
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 November 2009 17:44:23 Dale wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm in the middle of a world update. I'm sort of doing it in parts
>> because of the device-mapper issue. Anyway, I keep getting the
>> @preserved-rebuild at the end of the emerge. I run it and it wants to
On Tuesday 10 November 2009 17:44:23 Dale wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm in the middle of a world update. I'm sort of doing it in parts
> because of the device-mapper issue. Anyway, I keep getting the
> @preserved-rebuild at the end of the emerge. I run it and it wants to
> run it again. When I run it a
Dale writes:
> I'm in the middle of a world update. I'm sort of doing it in parts
> because of the device-mapper issue. Anyway, I keep getting the
> @preserved-rebuild at the end of the emerge. I run it and it wants to
> run it again. When I run it again, it wants to run it again. It's the
>
Hi,
I'm in the middle of a world update. I'm sort of doing it in parts
because of the device-mapper issue. Anyway, I keep getting the
@preserved-rebuild at the end of the emerge. I run it and it wants to
run it again. When I run it again, it wants to run it again. It's the
same packages over
On Sunday 11 October 2009 09:45:08 Dale wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I recently did some upgrading which lead to some other packages having
> to be rebuilt. I have one that can't build and hasn't been able to for
> ages so I assume it isn't going to be fixed. It is hearts which is
> pulled in my kde-meta.
Hi,
I recently did some upgrading which lead to some other packages having
to be rebuilt. I have one that can't build and hasn't been able to for
ages so I assume it isn't going to be fixed. It is hearts which is
pulled in my kde-meta. This rebuild also forced me to upgrade kbackup
which doesn'
On Saturday 26 September 2009, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 20:58:35 +0700, Robin Atwood wrote:
> > I had exactly the same problem. I solved it by deleting
> > /var/lib/portage/preserved_libs_registry with no ill effects (since
> > revdep- rebuild was clean).
>
> No apparent ill effe
On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 20:58:35 +0700, Robin Atwood wrote:
> I had exactly the same problem. I solved it by deleting
> /var/lib/portage/preserved_libs_registry with no ill effects (since
> revdep- rebuild was clean).
No apparent ill effects. You now have the old, orphaned version of the
library on
On Friday 25 September 2009, James wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> I keep getting this mesaage on one particulary system:
>
> existing preserved libs:
> package: sys-libs/readline-6.0_p3
> * - /lib64/libreadline.so
> * - /lib64/libreadline.so.5
> * - /lib64/libreadline.so.5.2
> * used by /usr
Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 1:25 PM, James wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>> I keep getting this mesaage on one particulary system:
>>
>> existing preserved libs:
>> package: sys-libs/readline-6.0_p3
>> * - /lib64/libreadline.so
>> * - /lib64/libreadline.so.5
>> * - /l
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 1:25 PM, James wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> I keep getting this mesaage on one particulary system:
>
> existing preserved libs:
> package: sys-libs/readline-6.0_p3
> * - /lib64/libreadline.so
> * - /lib64/libreadline.so.5
> * - /lib64/libreadline.so.5.2
> * used by /u
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 1:25 PM, James wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> I keep getting this mesaage on one particulary system:
>
> existing preserved libs:
> package: sys-libs/readline-6.0_p3
> * - /lib64/libreadline.so
> * - /lib64/libreadline.so.5
> * - /lib64/libreadline.so.5.2
> * used by /u
Hello,
I keep getting this mesaage on one particulary system:
existing preserved libs:
package: sys-libs/readline-6.0_p3
* - /lib64/libreadline.so
* - /lib64/libreadline.so.5
* - /lib64/libreadline.so.5.2
* used by /usr/bin/calgebra (kde-base/kalgebra-4.2.4)
So I've rebuilt kalgeg
69 matches
Mail list logo
