Re: [gentoo-user] [HEADSUP] New udev-186 breaks pulseaudio

2012-07-05 Thread Todd Goodman
* Neil Bothwick [120705 11:53]: > On Thu, 5 Jul 2012 09:40:15 -0500, Paul Hartman wrote: > > > > I backed down to udev-182-r3, which fixed the problem, but I had > > > to run revdep-rebuild (again) to fix all the other packages that > > > did build against libudev.so.1 and now had to be rebuilt a

Re: [gentoo-user] [HEADSUP] New udev-186 breaks pulseaudio

2012-07-05 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Thu, 5 Jul 2012 09:40:15 -0500, Paul Hartman wrote: > > I backed down to udev-182-r3, which fixed the problem, but I had > > to run revdep-rebuild (again) to fix all the other packages that > > did build against libudev.so.1 and now had to be rebuilt a second > > time against libudev.so.0. >

Re: [gentoo-user] [HEADSUP] New udev-186 breaks pulseaudio

2012-07-05 Thread Paul Hartman
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 7:01 AM, walt wrote: > udev-186 replaces libudev.so.0 with libudev.so.1, and pulseaudio > won't compile against it. If you need pulse, avoid udev-186. > > I backed down to udev-182-r3, which fixed the problem, but I had > to run revdep-rebuild (again) to fix all the other p

[gentoo-user] [HEADSUP] New udev-186 breaks pulseaudio

2012-07-05 Thread walt
udev-186 replaces libudev.so.0 with libudev.so.1, and pulseaudio won't compile against it. If you need pulse, avoid udev-186. I backed down to udev-182-r3, which fixed the problem, but I had to run revdep-rebuild (again) to fix all the other packages that did build against libudev.so.1 and now ha