On Thu, 31 July 2014, at 5:58 pm, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 10:13:25AM +0200, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
>
>> In the meanwhile I found ddrescue... :)
>>
>> It took me five hours to copy the disk (1T) binaryly (this word looks
>> wrong...)
>
> hm... not a native speak
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 10:13:25AM +0200, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> In the meanwhile I found ddrescue... :)
>
> It took me five hours to copy the disk (1T) binaryly (this word looks
> wrong...)
hm... not a native speaker, but:
binarily?
in binary?
If in doubt, leave it out:
in a binary manne
Am 26.07.2014 18:09, schrieb meino.cra...@gmx.de:
> Volker Armin Hemmann [14-07-26 18:00]:
>> Am 26.07.2014 14:16, schrieb meino.cra...@gmx.de:
>>> Volker Armin Hemmann [14-07-26 14:08]:
Am 26.07.2014 12:26, schrieb meino.cra...@gmx.de:
> Mick [14-07-26 11:28]:
>> On Saturday 26 Jul
Volker Armin Hemmann [14-07-26 18:00]:
> Am 26.07.2014 14:16, schrieb meino.cra...@gmx.de:
> > Volker Armin Hemmann [14-07-26 14:08]:
> >> Am 26.07.2014 12:26, schrieb meino.cra...@gmx.de:
> >>> Mick [14-07-26 11:28]:
> On Saturday 26 Jul 2014 02:49:15 meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> > Hi,
Am 26.07.2014 14:16, schrieb meino.cra...@gmx.de:
> Volker Armin Hemmann [14-07-26 14:08]:
>> Am 26.07.2014 12:26, schrieb meino.cra...@gmx.de:
>>> Mick [14-07-26 11:28]:
On Saturday 26 Jul 2014 02:49:15 meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After running smartctl for an extended
Volker Armin Hemmann [14-07-26 14:08]:
> Am 26.07.2014 12:26, schrieb meino.cra...@gmx.de:
> > Mick [14-07-26 11:28]:
> >> On Saturday 26 Jul 2014 02:49:15 meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> After running smartctl for an extended offline test I got
> >>> a badblock (information extr
On Saturday 26 Jul 2014 11:26:54 meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> got this:
>
> #> /root>mkswap -L swap -c /dev/sda2
> 1 bad page
OK, so we know for sure now that the bad block was on your swap. :-)
> Sorry for stuutering postings...overlocked this one:
> #>dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sda2 bs=512 con
Volker Armin Hemmann [14-07-26 14:08]:
> Am 26.07.2014 12:26, schrieb meino.cra...@gmx.de:
> > Mick [14-07-26 11:28]:
> >> On Saturday 26 Jul 2014 02:49:15 meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> After running smartctl for an extended offline test I got
> >>> a badblock (information extr
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> Am 26.07.2014 03:49, schrieb meino.cra...@gmx.de:
>> How severe is the problem?
>>
> first bad block? Not at all. Your drive's firmware knows about it, so
> all read/write access should either generate an error your system can
> deal with or will be mapped tranparently
Am 26.07.2014 12:26, schrieb meino.cra...@gmx.de:
> Mick [14-07-26 11:28]:
>> On Saturday 26 Jul 2014 02:49:15 meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> After running smartctl for an extended offline test I got
>>> a badblock (information extracted from the report):
>>>
>>> SMART Self-test log st
Am 26.07.2014 03:49, schrieb meino.cra...@gmx.de:
> How severe is the problem?
>
first bad block? Not at all. Your drive's firmware knows about it, so
all read/write access should either generate an error your system can
deal with or will be mapped tranparently to a working reserve block.
Since it
Mick [14-07-26 11:28]:
> On Saturday 26 Jul 2014 02:49:15 meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > After running smartctl for an extended offline test I got
> > a badblock (information extracted from the report):
> >
> > SMART Self-test log structure revision number 1
> > Num Test_Description
Mick [14-07-26 11:28]:
> On Saturday 26 Jul 2014 02:49:15 meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > After running smartctl for an extended offline test I got
> > a badblock (information extracted from the report):
> >
> > SMART Self-test log structure revision number 1
> > Num Test_Description
Mick [14-07-26 11:28]:
> On Saturday 26 Jul 2014 02:49:15 meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > After running smartctl for an extended offline test I got
> > a badblock (information extracted from the report):
> >
> > SMART Self-test log structure revision number 1
> > Num Test_Description
On Saturday 26 Jul 2014 02:49:15 meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After running smartctl for an extended offline test I got
> a badblock (information extracted from the report):
>
> SMART Self-test log structure revision number 1
> Num Test_DescriptionStatus Remaining L
Dale [14-07-26 09:54]:
> meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > After running smartctl for an extended offline test I got
> > a badblock (information extracted from the report):
> >
> > SMART Self-test log structure revision number 1
> > Num Test_DescriptionStatus Remaini
meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After running smartctl for an extended offline test I got
> a badblock (information extracted from the report):
>
> SMART Self-test log structure revision number 1
> Num Test_DescriptionStatus Remaining LifeTime(hours)
> LBA_of_first_err
Hi,
After running smartctl for an extended offline test I got
a badblock (information extracted from the report):
SMART Self-test log structure revision number 1
Num Test_DescriptionStatus Remaining LifeTime(hours)
LBA_of_first_error
# 1 Extended offlineCompleted: re
18 matches
Mail list logo