Hi,
I got some MP3 files which seem not to be properly coded. The
Interpret/Title information is missing for some, other show very ugly
time information in XMMS ( -234567:21, 893767:13 i.e.) but the
frame/duration in the MP3 info is correct.
Are there any tools (preferred command line) to decode
On Friday 01 September 2006 17:47, sdoma wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I got some MP3 files which seem not to be properly coded. The
> Interpret/Title information is missing for some, other show very ugly
> time information in XMMS ( -234567:21, 893767:13 i.e.) but the
> frame/duration in the MP3 info is correc
On Fri, 2006-09-01 at 18:12 +0200, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> On Friday 01 September 2006 17:47, sdoma wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I got some MP3 files which seem not to be properly coded. The
> > Interpret/Title information is missing for some, other show very ugly
> > time information in XMMS ( -2
On Friday 01 September 2006 18:21, sdoma wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-09-01 at 18:12 +0200, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> > On Friday 01 September 2006 17:47, sdoma wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I got some MP3 files which seem not to be properly coded. The
> > > Interpret/Title information is missing for
On 01 September 2006 16:47, sdoma wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I got some MP3 files which seem not to be properly coded. The
> Interpret/Title information is missing for some, other show very ugly
> time information in XMMS ( -234567:21, 893767:13 i.e.) but the
> frame/duration in the MP3 info is correct.
>
>
On Fri, 2006-09-01 at 18:58 +0200, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> > Could you point me to some of the "lots of tools" you mentioned?
>
> media-sound/audiotag
> Latest version available: 0.15
> Latest version installed: [ Not Installed ]
> Size of downloaded files: 14 kB
> H
On Friday 01 September 2006 19:58, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> On Friday 01 September 2006 18:21, sdoma wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-09-01 at 18:12 +0200, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> > > On Friday 01 September 2006 17:47, sdoma wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I got some MP3 files which seem not
On 9/1/06, Hemmann, Volker Armin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And recoding: mp3 is a lossy format. If you turn them into wavs you have not
only wavs based on reduced information, you remove the stuff that makes mp3
sound 'better' than they are. If you encode them again, you are removing more
inform
quoth the Hemmann, Volker Armin:
> On Friday 01 September 2006 17:47, sdoma wrote:
>
> even if there are tools - don't do it.
>
> The artist/title info is in the id4 tags - you can edit them with lots of
> tools, even inside most players. No need to recode them.
This is true, no need to re-encode
On Friday 01 September 2006 21:23, darren kirby wrote:
> "Hardly bearable"? Maybe if you have the ears of a dog. If you start with a
> decent bitrate in the first place (128+) I don't see a difference with
> naked ears at all.
I hear the fine high pitch sound of TVs and I hear the fine high noise
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> I hear the fine high pitch sound of TVs and I hear the fine high noise of
> marten repellants. So yes, I have the ears of a dog.
You are not alone boy! I used to get to my girlfriend's house, and although the
TV was ma
On Saturday 02 September 2006 01:14, Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman wrote:
> Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> > I hear the fine high pitch sound of TVs and I hear the fine high noise of
> > marten repellants. So yes, I have the ears of a dog.
>
> You are not alone boy! I used to get to my girlfriend's hou
quoth the Hemmann, Volker Armin:
> On Friday 01 September 2006 21:23, darren kirby wrote:
> > "Hardly bearable"? Maybe if you have the ears of a dog. If you start with
> > a decent bitrate in the first place (128+) I don't see a difference with
> > naked ears at all.
>
> I hear the fine high pitch
Well,
seeing where this thread tends to ;) ...
It seems my problems are related to XMMS bugs. I can edit the
Interpret/Title/Album info from "Amarok". Amarok shows the track lengths
correct and the "Fixmp3" tool Martin pointed to says that there are no
errors in the tracks.
Thanks for your help
F
On Saturday 02 September 2006 04:54, kashani wrote:
> Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> > On Saturday 02 September 2006 01:14, Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman wrote:
> >> Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> >>> I hear the fine high pitch sound of TVs and I hear the fine high noise
> >>> of marten repellants. So
On Saturday 02 September 2006 03:53, darren kirby wrote:
> quoth the Hemmann, Volker Armin:
> > On Friday 01 September 2006 21:23, darren kirby wrote:
> > > "Hardly bearable"? Maybe if you have the ears of a dog. If you start
> > > with a decent bitrate in the first place (128+) I don't see a
> > >
16 matches
Mail list logo
