-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Corbin wrote:
Thanks. I happened on that thread this morning, and I did search, but I
guess
it was too fresh for Google.
Well yea, I would try www.gmane.org next time. It is a great resource
because it tracks ALOT of mailing lists
On Friday 16 June 2006 11:08 pm, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
David Corbin wrote:
while attempt to upgrade my system, I'm getting this failure.
i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I../..
-I../../include -I../../include -I../../src -I../../src/xine-engine
while attempt to upgrade my system, I'm getting this failure.
i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I../.. -I../../include
-I../../include -I../../src -I../../src/xine-engine -I../../src/xine-engine
-I../../src/xine-utils -I../../src/input -I../../src/input -I../../lib
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Corbin wrote:
while attempt to upgrade my system, I'm getting this failure.
i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I../..
-I../../include
-I../../include -I../../src -I../../src/xine-engine -I../../src/xine-engine
Is anyone here running Gentoo with -fvisibility=hidden in his CFLAGS ?
Never experienced any problem?
Thanks,
Julien
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On 14:11 Sat 21 May , Julien Cayzac wrote:
Is anyone here running Gentoo with -fvisibility=hidden in his CFLAGS ?
Never experienced any problem?
Thanks,
Julien
iirc it does't make sense to have it in your CLFAGS, since it only
affects c++ stuff (so it'd go in CXXFLAGS)
It does cause
On 5/21/05, David Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It does cause problems with kde stuff, and with wxGTK stuff though
Thanks for the answer, I won't put it in my make.conf yet...
Have some bugreports been raised for the problems you described yet?
If not, it might be worth it to add them to
On Sat, 2005-05-21 at 15:05 +, Julien Cayzac wrote:
On 5/21/05, David Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It does cause problems with kde stuff, and with wxGTK stuff though
Thanks for the answer, I won't put it in my make.conf yet...
Have some bugreports been raised for the problems you
On Sunday 22 May 2005 00:43, Julien Cayzac wrote:
On 5/21/05, Jason Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You miss the point. Adding that flag to CFLAGS (or CXXFLAGS) is faulty in
and of itself. It is not a general optimization flag. It is something
that each package's codebase needs to be
9 matches
Mail list logo
